Inline FabricationTitan ReloadingMidSouth Shooters SupplyWideners
RotoMetals2Lee PrecisionReloading EverythingLoad Data
Repackbox
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: New sight on an old rifle

  1. #1
    Boolit Man
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    98

    New sight on an old rifle

    I posted about this rifle when I acquired it 4 or 5 years ago. I just installed a new front sight on it which has rekindled my interest in it and also a good excuse to post again. First the rifle. It was made by I. Hollis & Sons in Birmingham, England in the 1880's and was retailed in South Africa. It has been well used and equally well cared for. The bore is excellent and it is a great shooter.



    It has a series of leaf sights and a tall volley sight. This was a common sight design in South Africa at the time. The leaf sights were good for hunting and the volley sight was useful when civilians were called upon for defense. Some have stated that this sight was a requirement at that time, but that may be just legend.



    It is chambered in 577/450. I load a 480 gr. lead bullet over 85 grs of Goex 2F. Makes a lot of smoke and noise. I form the brass out of a 24 gauge brass shotshell.



    This rifle has always been a good shooter, but the front sight left a bit to be desired. It is made of brass and looks home made. Very rough compared to the rest of the rifle. It is also tall and thin and slightly bent to one side. Despite that I have shot 2" - 3" groups at 100 yards, but as my eye sight continues to age it has gotten harder to see. I wanted a different front sight, but hesitated to alter this old beauty. However, I am primarily a shooter and not a collector. I decided that since the sight was not original I would change it out. I could always re-install the old one. I wanted something to period. I had a Beech sight that I took off a rolling block. Although it is unlikely that this front sight would have been seen in South Africa it is correct for the time period. The dovetail was too small for the base so I sat down with a small triangular file and slowly filed the base to fit. Took a while. There is no putting metal back if you go too far too fast. In the end I think this sight looks quite good on this rifle. I am not shooting it any better, but at least I can clearly see it. I suspect that a better shot with better eyes could really make this old gal hit.


  2. #2
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    215
    I like that Sight. Use the blade when walking around and the post for fine work at a distance.

    I have an Ithaca single shot rifle from my childhood that looks like a Win 94 but has the martini action.

    I need a martini rifle.....

  3. #3
    Boolit Master marlinman93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2,730
    Your new sight is in backwards. The flat rear of the post is supposed to be to the rear.

  4. #4
    Boolit Grand Master
    Mk42gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Butler, MO
    Posts
    9,020
    It looks like the globe would overhang the muzzle if it was installed the conventional way.

    Robert

  5. #5
    Boolit Man
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by Mk42gunner View Post
    It looks like the globe would overhang the muzzle if it was installed the conventional way.

    Robert
    Exactly. The sight picture is the same either way. It works fine.

  6. #6
    Boolit Master
    elk hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Central Oregon
    Posts
    1,540
    Lovely! I'm jealous!! Oh how I do like English stalking rifles. I have been wanting a 16 bore muzzle loading stalking rifle to hunt elk with but other things have kept me from getting it built. Enjoy your treasure.
    BIG OR SMALL I LIKE THEM ALL, 577 TO 22 HORNET.

  7. #7
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,900
    Yes, that is a beautiful rifle. One thing I find interesting is that it is one of the early rifle actions which very much resemble the Greener GP shotgun, which quite a few people have rebuilt into rifles. It would be interesting to know if it has the standard Martini-Henry 1in. barrel threads and breechblock width, or the wider ones of the GP. Am I right in thinking it doesn't have the GP split-receiver ring takedown system? If you are lucky it might have a groove diameter suitable for currently common .458 bullets, and concentric or Metford form rifling. But most likely it is Martini-Henry style, a seven-sided polygon with ridges in each apex. It will catch fouling a little more, but you can't have everything.

    It wouldn't take knowing the retailer to suggest that this was a rifle for the South African trade. The leaf plus ladder sight was common there, and there was a tendency to go for rifles much like a single-barrelled match rifle, rather than the doubles that found favour in East Africa and India. It is, typical for that market, plain but not cheap. For that long textured rib is the first thing they would have saved on.

    The muzzle-loader style cleaning rod makes a lot of sense, for it permits clearing a barrel accidentally jammed with earth. It was difficult to keep horses healthy in the fly belts further north, but mmost South African hunting was done on horseback, and that was the best way to keep a cleaning-rod safe. It looks like that steel jag would unscrew, to be replaced with brushes. If there is a butt-trap you might even find some. Parker-Hale cleaning rods (though they may have changed during their various corporate vicissitudes) used to have the thread inherited from the muzzle-loading Enfield, before Mr. Whitworth invented standardization of screws. I have seen this quoted as a .283in by 26tpi male thread on the rod, but I believe 26⅔ is the truth. There are brass adapters on the market, but they may all go in the direction PH rod to brushes etc. made by boring old normals.

    The Beech sight is very much in keeping. I have one on a derelict Ballard barrelled action, which has remained unrestored since I found it dated from the pre-Marlin Ballard malleable-cast days. Yours wouldn't be the best way round if it was of steel, with worn bluing. But in brass it should give nicely reflected sky-light against a dark target - and is this a rifle to shoot at nothing but black and white paper for evermore?

    Some people have reported poor brass life with the Magtech cases and full power BP loads. You might do better if some sort of fibre, epoxy or silicon base cup could be placed inside. I don't know th at I would fancy that for a Snider or 24ga shotgun (I've got mine!), as they might come out and become a bore obstruction. These don't need it as much anyway. But if put in before necking to .450 it should be safe. The cartridge should be at least as effective on lqrge game as any of the civilian black powder express rounds, and probably more so. Slow rifling and extremely hollow bullets to get up to about 1900ft./sec. were a snare and a delusion.

    As usual with guns like this, you wonder where they have been, what they have seen.

  8. #8
    Boolit Man
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    98

  9. #9
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,900
    Ah yes, those are very useful pictures to have. I might be wrong, but it looked to me as if the rebated top of the pistol grip socket on your rifle was a shade lower, while the drawings look a little more like the MkIV military Martini. As I doubt if production of those, revised from the newly designed .402 to .577/.450, was rather superseded by the Lee-Metford, I imagine a lot of spare receiver forgings or unused tooling lying around. Still, if a change took place it is no more than a small-volume carmaker taking to a different engine or different gearbox for the same models.

    The safety is probably Hollis or their contractor's own addition, which wouldn't be too difficult to do. It is a sear safety, acting on the tumbler, and much better than the trigger safety sometimes seen.

    Front sights very much like yours, and the screw-adjustable one shown with the Hollis target rifle, are available (at a price) from Track of the Wolf. For a sporting rifle it would be very vulnerable, though, and I believe I would make my own, with better protected screws, from the one in the second URL below.



    https://www.trackofthewolf.com/List/Item.aspx/875/1


    https://www.trackofthewolf.com/Categ...875/2/FS-SWISS

  10. #10
    Boolit Master BigEyeBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South of the Equator and North of Capricorn
    Posts
    508
    Nice rifle ,I like the Beech sight .The rear sights are commonly known as cape sights ,Ive seen them on sxs cape guns and paradox guns .They were common on the BSA sporting rifles ,wrongly named " Lee Speed " they are BSA sporting rifles with the LeeSpeed patents.
    My BSA pattern 4 sporting rifle has them ,but with one standing and two folding
    ( 100 ,200 and 300 yds ) leaves ,and the ladder sight graduated to 1000 yds.
    Kev

  11. #11
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,900
    I know WW Greener wrote that there was no use in a dealer (he meant other dealers) trying to palm off inferior products on the South African market, which was too discerning for that, but Americans would buy anything. Still, he was probably talking mostly about shotguns, where his definition of quality was higher and more expensive than it took to get the job done for a generation or two.

  12. #12
    Boolit Grand Master In Remembrance
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    6,314
    I had a Beech sight that I took off a rolling block.
    Gentemen, the front sight is a BEACH Combination ... http://www.assra.com/cgi-bin/yabb/Ya...90527313/16#16

    Don't feel badly if you spelled it wrong because after over 125 years ... even the vendors can't spell correctly!
    Regards
    John

  13. #13
    Boolit Master BigEyeBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South of the Equator and North of Capricorn
    Posts
    508
    Quote Originally Posted by John Boy View Post
    Gentemen, the front sight is a BEACH Combination ... http://www.assra.com/cgi-bin/yabb/Ya...90527313/16#16

    Don't feel badly if you spelled it wrong because after over 125 years ... even the vendors can't spell correctly!

    I realized I spelt it wrong after I posted , should have edited it , but I'm a son of a beach and don't give a rats a***.

  14. #14
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Nampa , Idaho
    Posts
    736
    Very cool rifle like the new sights.

  15. #15
    Boolit Man
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by BigEyeBob View Post
    I realized I spelt it wrong after I posted , should have edited it , but I'm a son of a beach and don't give a rats a***.
    And I just do not know any better. Thank you for the info. I have seen it spelt both ways and never knew.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check