Originally Posted by
Ballistics in Scotland
A dedicated form die might or mightn't be sized to produce a case neck which needs to be sized down further in the loading die. But I think you are talking about forming in the loading die. This may be fine, but minus expander button it reduce the interior diameter smaller than bullet diameter, some brands of die by only a little but others by quite a lot. If you ream the unexpanded neck, it could leave you with more clearance than you need between cartridge neck and your chamber. Even military rifles don't all have large chambers, and plenty of sporting 7x57 rifles were as closely chambered as any other.
I'd make a cast and measure that chamber neck, which itself may have a slight taper, and be otherwise measurable only by an expensive set of pin gauges. Sacrificing an expander button is better business than sing brass you don't like, for as long as you have the rifle. You could reduce a standard 7mm. expander button with abrasive paper while holding it in an electric drill, until it gives outside of the case just the clearance in your own chamber neck that you would want. Then decide whether it needs reaming, and to what size. For loading you would use the unmodified expander button.
A hand reamer is cheaper than the fine graduations of machine reamer, and it has a tapered lead which helps to centre the case if a bench drill is used. But they don't come in that fine range of sizes, and having someone make or modify a reamer is likely to be most expensive of all. 9/32in. is a standard hand reamer size though, and equals .2812in. If you think that is a thousandth or two smaller than you would want to load bullets into, just size your temporary case-forming button to give that extra thousandth or two clearance in the chamber and again use the unmodified button for loading.
me.
I've never found anything wrong with straight-fluted solid reamers when turned fast by machine, but they might if used by hand, for which reason almost all hand reamers are spiral. I mistrust adjustable reamers for just about any job. They are extremely likely to cut a slightly star-shaped hole. There is no point at all in paying for carbide to use on clean brass, but I suppose you might want to use it on something else another time.
I think slight tightness of neck in chamber is more dangerous than many people think. They measure bullet pull or they assume it can't be very different from bullet push, in the bullet seating operation, but I don't think that is the issue. Col. Townsend Whelen was involved in the experimental issue of National Match .30-06 ammunition with tin-plated bullets, and this increased the bullet pull so much that they broke the testing machine. But accidents didn't start happening until people who didn't know that tin was pretty good at cutting nickel fouling on its own used the forbidden illicit dodge of greasing the bullet. Then they did. He thought the problem arose when grease filled the space between neck and chamber, for like water grease acts like a solid if pressure on it is sufficiently sudden. Nearly all diving height records have involved serious injury.
My interpretation is that bullets aren't released from the case by pulling, or rather pushing. It happens because pressure comes between case-neck and bullet, like blowing into a clinging rubber glove, and even a lightly-clamped neck prevents that.