Snyders JerkyRepackboxInline FabricationLee Precision
Load DataRotoMetals2WidenersReloading Everything
Titan Reloading MidSouth Shooters Supply
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: Remington RM380 and R51 Compact

  1. #1
    Boolit Master


    JeffG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Liberty NC
    Posts
    663

    Remington RM380 and R51 Compact

    I was just looking at email and browsed over to Brownells and they showed a deal on Remington RM380, which I hadn't heard of yet so went to Remington's site and saw the R51 is back up on their site again. Anybody seen or purchased the RM380 or the re-released R51? Man I love the way the R51 looks, that could really be me.


  2. #2
    Boolit Buddy c1skout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Hills of PA
    Posts
    374
    No input on either gun...... but Man, it seems like you can't be in the gun business without offering a version of Kel-Tec's P3at these days!

  3. #3
    Boolit Grand Master
    9.3X62AL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Redlands, NorKifornia
    Posts
    11,551
    Wasn't aware of either handgun's status.......look interesting, I thought the 9mm/Rem 51 concept was a good one--but deeply flawed via shoddy execution by its manufacturer. I hope this is more than just new paint job by ad copy on a recycled clunker.
    I don't paint bullets. I like Black Rifle Coffee. Sacred cows are always fair game. California is to the United States what Syria is to Russia and North Korea is to China/South Korea/Japan--a Hermit Kingdom detached from the real world and led by delusional maniacs, an economic and social basket case sustained by "foreign" aid so as to not lose military bases.

  4. #4
    Boolit Master


    JeffG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Liberty NC
    Posts
    663
    I hear you. It would be nice to know what was done to address issues.

  5. #5
    Boolit Master jameslovesjammie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Plentywood
    Posts
    850
    It's a Rohrbaugh. Remington bought Rohrbaugh in 2014.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wmGhmxh3HA

  6. #6
    Boolit Grand Master
    Mk42gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Butler, MO
    Posts
    9,053
    While I like the idea of the R51; I will wait until there are a bunch, that work, out in the hands of real world buyers before I spend my money on one.

    The stench of glowing reviews of basically hand built prototypes versus production jamamatics still lingers.

    Robert

  7. #7
    Boolit Master Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Eastern Maryland
    Posts
    557
    Do you remember the Colt 2000?
    Listen! Do you hear it. The roar of cannons, the screams of the dying! Ahh! Music to my ears!

  8. #8
    Boolit Grand Master
    rintinglen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Orange, VA NOW
    Posts
    6,524
    And the DS II?
    Amazing how good the guns in the writers' hands are.
    _________________________________________________It's not that I can't spell: it is that I can't type.

  9. #9
    Boolit Grand Master
    Mk42gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Butler, MO
    Posts
    9,053
    Yes sir, and the Double Eagle.

  10. #10
    Boolit Grand Master
    9.3X62AL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Redlands, NorKifornia
    Posts
    11,551
    Once burned/twice shy. I will wait this out as well.
    I don't paint bullets. I like Black Rifle Coffee. Sacred cows are always fair game. California is to the United States what Syria is to Russia and North Korea is to China/South Korea/Japan--a Hermit Kingdom detached from the real world and led by delusional maniacs, an economic and social basket case sustained by "foreign" aid so as to not lose military bases.

  11. #11
    Boolit Master JHeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    WA state/ BC mountains
    Posts
    619
    It sounded like Remington was hinting at also producing the Pedersen-designed Model 53 .45 which the Navy and Marines preferred over the 1911. The thing worked -- apparently really well -- in 1918. Given the astonishing market for .45s and particularly 1911s, with prices way into four figures for some of them, reviving the original Model 53 would sound like a good investment.

    https://www.forgottenweapons.com/remington-m53/

    I understand Rem could not resurrect the Model 51 verbatim, too expensive for a modern .380 in a field of pocket blow-backs.

    But a production Model 53 .45 would be proven technology, with a huge potential market. Pre-tested to satisfaction by the Navy and Marines. Made even easier to produce by modern CNC and MIM.

    Too bad Remington tripped over trying to make a 9mm+P sub-compact first, since that pressure level in that size pistol with the Pedersen design was new territory, requiring a complete new design which turned out not to be very manufacturable.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Central Virginia
    Posts
    7,439
    I really want the Remington R51 to succeed and think the concept is sound. However, Remington needs to rebuild some trust before I will buy one.
    The pistol has promise if they can turn out good examples.

  13. #13
    Boolit Master

    376Steyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    South Idaho
    Posts
    1,483
    FWIW: Davidson's Gallery of Guns has plenty of RM380's in stock, but has now dropped all mention of the R51 from its online catalog.

  14. #14
    Boolit Grand Master
    9.3X62AL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Redlands, NorKifornia
    Posts
    11,551
    Quote Originally Posted by 376Steyr View Post
    FWIW: Davidson's Gallery of Guns has plenty of RM380's in stock, but has now dropped all mention of the R51 from its online catalog.
    Can't say I blame them. Realtors don't like disclosing sex offender parolee locations on their sales literature, either.
    I don't paint bullets. I like Black Rifle Coffee. Sacred cows are always fair game. California is to the United States what Syria is to Russia and North Korea is to China/South Korea/Japan--a Hermit Kingdom detached from the real world and led by delusional maniacs, an economic and social basket case sustained by "foreign" aid so as to not lose military bases.

  15. #15
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2,435
    I think its going to take ALOT for most to put down any money on the R51. Has remington 'fixed' them? Or do they just think they can reintroduce the same gun without doing anything hoping everybody forgot? Few of us are willing to be the guinea pigs. So its unlikely if available they will fly off shelves, until after its proven they fixed them. And will take more than a few bribed gun mags with handpicked pistols to convince most of us.

  16. #16
    Boolit Master


    JeffG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Liberty NC
    Posts
    663
    Interesting article, thanks.

    Quote Originally Posted by JHeath View Post
    It sounded like Remington was hinting at also producing the Pedersen-designed Model 53 .45 which the Navy and Marines preferred over the 1911. The thing worked -- apparently really well -- in 1918. Given the astonishing market for .45s and particularly 1911s, with prices way into four figures for some of them, reviving the original Model 53 would sound like a good investment.

    https://www.forgottenweapons.com/remington-m53/

    I understand Rem could not resurrect the Model 51 verbatim, too expensive for a modern .380 in a field of pocket blow-backs.

    But a production Model 53 .45 would be proven technology, with a huge potential market. Pre-tested to satisfaction by the Navy and Marines. Made even easier to produce by modern CNC and MIM.

    Too bad Remington tripped over trying to make a 9mm+P sub-compact first, since that pressure level in that size pistol with the Pedersen design was new territory, requiring a complete new design which turned out not to be very manufacturable.

  17. #17
    Boolit Master JHeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    WA state/ BC mountains
    Posts
    619
    Any gun -- even most new ones -- are a project to most of us. Many people buy new guns plan to spend another $200 or $2000 to make them "just what I wanted." 1911s, Ruger single actions, etc. New rifles these days are pretty well sorted, but most of us have bought rifles expecting to pay for trigger jobs after that, bed them, fire lap them etc etc.

    Doug makes a trade in opening Ruger revolver throats to match the groove dia, after the gun left the factory. Does that make Blackhawks/ SBHs/ Redhawks etc. a bunch of lemons for which you won't be the guinea pig? Take them off the market, right? Why should you be the beta tester?

    The early reviews of the R51 tell me that it can be made to work and might be a nifty and unique little pistol.

    If Rem. sells me a $400 pistol with features I can't get anywhere else, and I spend 30 minutes on the bench with a needle file and $25 on aftermarket springs to get it working right, it may be bad QC but it doesn't bother me much, if I know how to deal with it.

    How many forearm tuning kits have been sold to get Ruger No. 1s to shoot right? Would you have strangled that model in the crib?

    Remington 700 safeties? Entire design invalidated?

    How many Timney triggers have been sold for rifles that should have been "made right in the first place"?

    I'm looking at my (original) Model 51 and realizing that the occasional cracked breechblocks I hear about probably result from what looks like an obvious and unecessary stress concentration on a corner that could be removed with a bit of filing/polishing. Almost like they weren't properly deburred or the edges "broken." The pistol left the factory in this condition about 93 years ago. I paid about $400 for it.

    Why should I have to fix that? Remington should have done it 93 years ago. I could gripe about Remington using me as a guinea pig, and about being made to beta test a $400 handgun, and how QC committed an outrage against me. Or I could fix it and enjoy a unique pistol and stop whining.

  18. #18
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2,435
    Your talking apples and oranges. Yea we buy production guns and maybe they need some tuning up. But they are still operational and safe to use. They will work with slightly undersized throats, and will fire with non aftermarket springs in them. The R51 was pretty much junk. Rear sights that fell out being handled at the gun shop? Or some that you could not even pull the slide back on, out of the box? Or firing out of battery? Thats not something you should have to buy aftermarket springs and spend time fixing. Anymore than most of us would buy a new car that 'needed work' to be safe to drive. Yes people do put stereos in cars, but not because the factory one quit 2 days after it was bought, they simply wanted a better one. People put rims on cars, not because the original ones were unsafe, they wanted different. Remington put out an unsafe gun, and then recalled them. It really is not much to ask that one of the most dangerous things you can use, a gun, will at least work and be safe if used properly.

    I know somebody whos kid was after one of those hover boards. You know the ones catching fire in use or burning homes down while being charged. Well Amazon has said send them back so they can be destroyed, and will not be selling them anymore. Now maybe they borrowed from the Remington book, build a really good prototype, then turn them into junk on the production line. But under your line of thinking, people should spend the money for a hover board, then go buy parts to fix it so it wont burn their house down, and not complain while doing it.

  19. #19
    Boolit Master JHeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    WA state/ BC mountains
    Posts
    619
    No an unsafe product is no good, loose dovetails ditto.

    But I see the gloating pigpile against this model from every wannabe Skeeter with their own blog or YouTube channel, and bet Rem Marketing dept says the product is dead when Rem tech dept says the tech problems are solvable. Because nobody will buy it until after 100,000 people have bought it, and it'll get nitpicked to death anyway. And the closed mindedness will prevent Rem from bringing out an R53, which is a shame because there's nothing interesting left to do with 1911s, they're everywhere.

  20. #20
    Boolit Grand Master
    9.3X62AL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Redlands, NorKifornia
    Posts
    11,551
    I get your drift, J Heath. More often than not, I have found myself "finishing construction" or refining some element of a new firearm/loading tool/bullet mould. I generally don't mind these sorts of things, but will admit to being less patient with these necessities as the price of the item gets larger. I should not have to pay close to $1000/OTD for a 327 Magnum revolver and still need to change a sight before my friends see me with it, especially after waiting YEARS for the maker to get off their aspirations to make the thing in the first place. No, after 7+ years of difficult-to-find firearms. ammo, and reloading components........my patience with lazy, uninspired, and shoddy gunsport supply stream is close to expiration.
    I don't paint bullets. I like Black Rifle Coffee. Sacred cows are always fair game. California is to the United States what Syria is to Russia and North Korea is to China/South Korea/Japan--a Hermit Kingdom detached from the real world and led by delusional maniacs, an economic and social basket case sustained by "foreign" aid so as to not lose military bases.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check