Snyders JerkyReloading EverythingMidSouth Shooters SupplyTitan Reloading
RepackboxLoad DataWidenersInline Fabrication
RotoMetals2 Lee Precision
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Remington's R51

  1. #1
    Boolit Master


    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    1,074

    Remington's R51

    I understand that a new, correctly functioning version of Remington's R51 9x19 mm semiautomatic pistol is being made. Having no manual or grip safety, does the design have an automatically engaging hammer blocking safety that allows the hammer to hit firing pin only when trigger is pulled?
    It’s so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and then don’t say it. Sam Levinson

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Central Virginia
    Posts
    7,439
    Based on this article it appears that it does have a firing pin safety: http://www.guns.com/2014/01/03/intro...uve-met-video/

    I can't say for certain but in today litigious society my guess would be that Remington would include a firing pin safety.

    And a firing pin safety doesn't stop the hammer from striking the firing pin but it does lock the firing pin when the trigger is not depressed.

  3. #3
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Naphtali View Post
    I understand that a new, correctly functioning version of Remington's R51 9x19 mm semiautomatic pistol is being made. Having no manual or grip safety, does the design have an automatically engaging hammer blocking safety that allows the hammer to hit firing pin only when trigger is pulled?
    The gun does have a grip safety. It's also quite a lemon:

    https://youtu.be/AvEAr9TJ51M

  4. #4
    Boolit Master JHeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    WA state/ BC mountains
    Posts
    621
    Quote Originally Posted by BadgerArms View Post
    The gun does have a grip safety. It's also quite a lemon:

    https://youtu.be/AvEAr9TJ51M
    I've heard of many Ruger No. 1s that were lemons. Also many more that were outstanding. Over time it proved itself.

    Some R51s seemed to work great. Remington had a quality control problem.

    Some models get off to a rough start. Doesn't make them bad guns. The 03 Springfield had bad heat treating and that joke of a rod bayonet. Also the 03 cartridge got a major tweak and a re-branding after introduction. Took years to sort it all out. Would you go back and strangle that one in the crib?

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Central Virginia
    Posts
    7,439
    Quote Originally Posted by Naphtali View Post
    I understand that a new, correctly functioning version of Remington's R51 9x19 mm semiautomatic pistol is being made....................
    Yes there were problems and they are trying to correct them. Give them a chance

  6. #6
    Boolit Master


    JeffG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Liberty NC
    Posts
    663
    I picked up one a few days ago and have fired 100 rounds of cast through it so far. Need to shoot it more and do some sight adjustment. Not as simple as your typical glock or M&P to break down for cleaning but that's okay. Beautiful machine work inside and out. No issues at all.

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Texas by God's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    14,506
    I'm still kicking the tires on one. It certainly is concealable and feels good in the hand. The Art Deco styling is neat.
    Best,Thomas

  8. #8
    Boolit Buddy michael.birdsley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Chesaning/Brant Mi
    Posts
    463
    I want to like this gun. I have no personal experience other that what I have read about the first ones that were recalled. Remington is coming out with another 9mm that i the the msrp of around 425 in the near future.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #9
    Boolit Master

    376Steyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    South Idaho
    Posts
    1,486
    I have one of the first of the new and improved models. It runs fine with factory jacketed, fine with one of my cast reloads, fair with a different cast reload. more info here: http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...R51-First-test

  10. #10
    Boolit Grand Master FergusonTO35's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Boonesborough, KY
    Posts
    6,969
    They sure seem like neat guns, I hope R-P gets them straightened out. I give props to gunmakers when they make an effort to be different, even when it doesn't go so well for them.
    Currently casting and loading: .32 Auto, .380 Auto, .38 Special, 9X19, .357 Magnum, .257 Roberts, 6.5 Creedmoor, .30 WCF, .308 WCF, .45-70.

  11. #11
    Boolit Master
    marlin39a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Paulden, Arizona
    Posts
    1,427
    I have no confidence that anything Remington makes these days is worth taking a chance on. Their golden days are gone.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Central Virginia
    Posts
    7,439
    The concept is good. The execution of that concept is the question.

    I'm very tempted to get one of the newly re-released editions and see if Remington has sorted it out. If I had to guess, Remington is selling them at or near cost now and the price will increase if the guns sell.

    I'm fearful that the pistol will not be on the market long and it may turn out to be one of those great designs that just didn't make it commercially.

    There's a lot to like in the design. Smooth, thin, lightweight, good sights, compact. It's not a H&K P7 but it's about the same size and half the weight for 1/3 the price. If the new ones work they could be great pistols.

    Give Remington a chance, they may have something good here.

  13. #13
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    1,013
    GONRA suggests all Design Nuts should get one.
    Remington Model 51's and the newer R51's are the only Real Live "Delayed Blowbacks" out there.

  14. #14
    Boolit Master Half Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Grand Prairie, TX
    Posts
    1,172
    I have a R51 Gen II. I shot factory ammo (115gr.) and hit low (~5" at 10 yards). I tried heavier factory ammo (125gr.) and still low. I sent it in to be looked at and when I got it back I couldn't tell anything had changed. I'm sending it back again and requesting that it be fired before returning it.
    The sooner I fall behind...the more time I have to catch up with

  15. #15
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    267
    Quote Originally Posted by GONRA View Post
    GONRA suggests all Design Nuts should get one.
    Remington Model 51's and the newer R51's are the only Real Live "Delayed Blowbacks" out there.
    I still have my CZ52 to fit that category - wouldn't mind a 9mm barrel but whatever...

    The R51 I really wanted to buy - almost bought G1 on impulse but didn't (who am I kidding - all my guns are impluse buys)
    Then G2 - I really really wanted it to be good - both to see Remington succeed and because the darn thing is sexy....

    But every review I looked at saw no real improvements on the second release - even youtubers that pretty much love everything they shoot didn't like it. I don't want any lemons.

  16. #16
    Boolit Master dkf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Pa
    Posts
    1,555
    Quote Originally Posted by marlin39a View Post
    I have no confidence that anything Remington makes these days is worth taking a chance on. Their golden days are gone.
    Same here. Many of the reviews on the Gen2 R51 still have issues with it. Then there are the issues with the new Remington RP9, some really obvious. Not worth the risk unless you get it dirt cheap and are willing to screw with it to get it running.

  17. #17
    Boolit Master
    A pause for the COZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    633
    Quote Originally Posted by BadgerArms View Post
    The gun does have a grip safety. It's also quite a lemon:

    https://youtu.be/AvEAr9TJ51M
    Mine certainly is no Lemon. Its no SIG for sure. But in the $400 price range for 9mm Autos.
    I find it on a par quality wise with most other offerings.
    What sets it apart ( IMOP) is the lower barrel axis and the delayed blow back operation.
    Makes the recoil less and easier to keep on target for follow up shots.
    I had commented that you have to try not to hit what your aiming at.

    That being said it is a quirky beast. Take down procedure takes practice to master.
    And the trigger is some what weird. Its a little tight out of the box. ( ok may be allot tight)
    But after about 600 rounds mine is smoothing out nicely.







    For me its worth the effort. I have guns that are pretty reliable but you have to train hard to be real proficient with it.
    This gun your already proficient with it. All the stuff you have to train to be consistent is already consistent.
    Pulls easy and lines right with the eye and hits what your trying to hit.
    Not a bad trait once you factor in stress.
    Just need to run a bunch of rounds to let the gun catch up.
    Ether way your training with the guns before your ready for EDC.
    Last edited by A pause for the COZ; 03-05-2017 at 06:02 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check