Load DataRotoMetals2Lee PrecisionRepackbox
Reloading EverythingSnyders JerkyWidenersInline Fabrication
MidSouth Shooters Supply Titan Reloading

View Poll Results: Which caliber 1873?

Voters
144. You may not vote on this poll
  • 357 Magnum

    64 44.44%
  • 45 Colt

    80 55.56%
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678
Results 141 to 150 of 150

Thread: Which cartridge in 1873 and why?

  1. #141
    Boolit Bub BoBSavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael J. Spangler View Post
    Give me an example of a more modern load in a 44-40 made specifically for the rifle. I know savvyjack has done a lot of work with this to squeeze out a lot more performance.

    I’m still not sure he could outperform a 44 magnum or a 45 Colt “magnumized”
    This has absolutely nothing to do with modern factory loads. It has everything to do with the intended design and use of the cartridge.

    Once again I refer you to this.....

    The handloader must bear in mind, however, that this cartridge is adapted to both rifle and handgun and must be loaded accordingly. Powder that burns well in the rifle barrel will not burn properly in the handgun barrel, and vice versa.

  2. #142
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    1,960
    For example, a case full of RE-7 and a 200 gr bullet is a healthy load for a rifle but a revolver is better suited to Bullseye, or WW231, or Unique, etc.

  3. #143
    Boolit Bub BoBSavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    74
    Now to try and get this rabbit whole back on track, the OP was about a Winchester 73' chambered for 357 Magnum or 45 Colt. If you want to compare apples and oranges, as was to the original off topic complaint.....try 44 Magnum Hornady 225 gr Leverlution FTX ammunition at about 150 yards. Yes, there are 44 Magnum Uberti Winchester 73's out there. I hear it is pretty darn good. Maybe try the same thing for the 45 Colt and 357 Magnum Winchester Levergun.

    https://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/3...0wiggle%20room.
    Last edited by BoBSavage; 09-25-2023 at 03:26 PM.

  4. #144
    Boolit Buddy

    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Tavernier, FL Fredericktown, PA
    Posts
    489
    Winchester 38-40 is a great cartridge! I have a Winchester 1873 rifle and a carbine in 38WCF. Years ago you could find 38-40's loaded with jacketed 180gr jacketed flat points. These cartridges were meant for revolvers and lever guns. They are very mild. I have taken the bullets out and dumped the propellant and recharged them with 26 grs of IMR4227 and re seated the jacketed bullet. Now you have a deer load! My 1894 Marlin shoots like it has eyes with this load. Bambi never stood a chance! I don't like to use this load in my 73' Winchesters. The 38-40 Winchester is great with cast boolits too. If ya don't like casting boolits the 40 S&W 180gr jacketed pistol bullets work great too. The hollow points look like nickels after hitting a hog or deer. Woodchucks blow up with the hollow point 40 S&W boolits. You will have a lot of opinions on 38 spec./357, 44-40 WCF, 38-40 WCF, or 45 Long Colt. Buy one of each and test em!! You will become an authority!

  5. #145
    Boolit Master


    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,113
    Quote Originally Posted by BoBSavage View Post
    This has absolutely nothing to do with modern factory loads. It has everything to do with the intended design and use of the cartridge.

    Once again I refer you to this.....

    The handloader must bear in mind, however, that this cartridge is adapted to both rifle and handgun and must be loaded accordingly. Powder that burns well in the rifle barrel will not burn properly in the handgun barrel, and vice versa.
    I agreed that rifle loads with a proper rifle powder and gain more performance.

    I guess I’m confused on what the point is though. Maybe I misunderstood but I thought you were saying 44 WCF is a higher performance cartridge than the modern pistol caliber cartridges.

    Did I misinterpret that somewhere in the mix?

    Also I’m the OP so I approve of the rabbit hole side tracks. I much prefer this type of conversation about ballistics and cartridges than one word answers.

  6. #146
    Boolit Bub BoBSavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael J. Spangler View Post
    I misunderstood but I thought you were saying 44 WCF is a higher performance cartridge than the modern pistol caliber cartridges.

    Did I misinterpret that somewhere in the mix?

    Also I’m the OP so I approve of the rabbit hole side tracks. I much prefer this type of conversation about ballistics and cartridges than one word answers.
    From what I can find, and from what I understand, the 44-40, being a rifle cartridge, performs best out of a rifle when the appropriate rifle powder is used to it's fullest extent. So yes, when loaded as a revolver cartridge, or when other "pistol cartridges" are loaded for use in rifles with pistol powders, they are inferior...the pistol "sized" rifle dash cartridges are superior for long distance (200 to 300 yards) and accuracy. "Accuracy" based on Townsend Whelen's 1920 data.

    However, if you look at those Hornady Leverevolution rifle loads I mentioned, a correctly loaded 44-40 (and even the 38-40 respectively) can be superior when loaded correctly, NOT HV loads.



    357 Magnum 140gr LeverRevolution
    Range Velocity Energy Trajectory Come Up (MOA) Come Up (MILS) Wind Drift Wind Drift (MOA) Wind Drift (MILS)
    0 1440 645 -1.5 0 0 0 0 0
    100 1154 414 0 0 0 0 0 0
    200 992 306 -24.6 11.7 3.4 0 0 0
    300 895 249 -84.4 26.8 7.8 0 0 0
    400 821 209 -187.6 44.8 13 0 0 0
    500 759 179 -342.7 65.4 19 0 0 0

    44 Magnum 225gr LeveRevolution
    Range Velocity Energy Trajectory Come Up (MOA) Come Up (MILS) Wind Drift Wind Drift (MOA) Wind Drift (MILS)
    0 1410 993 -1.5 0 0 0 0 0
    100 1102 607 0 0 0 0 0 0
    200 947 448 -26.9 12.9 3.7 0 0 0
    300 849 360 -92.6 29.5 8.6 0 0 0
    400 774 299 -206.5 49.3 14.3 0 0 0
    500 709 251 -378.9 72.3 21 0 0 0


    45 Colt 225gr LeveRevolution
    Range Velocity Energy Trajectory Come Up (MOA) Come Up (MILS) Wind Drift Wind Drift (MOA) Wind Drift (MILS)
    0 960 460 -1.5 0 0 0 0 0
    100 855 366 0 0 0 0 0 0
    200 776 301 -46 22 6.4 0 0 0
    300 708 251 -149.9 47.7 13.9 0 0 0
    400 649 210 -323.5 77.2 22.5 0 0 0
    500 594 177 -580 110.7 32.2 0 0 0


    Range Velocity Energy
    300, 900 to 950, 390 to 412, 217gr 44-40 correctly loaded for rifle use.
    Last edited by BoBSavage; 09-25-2023 at 07:24 PM.

  7. #147
    Boolit Master


    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,113
    Quote Originally Posted by BoBSavage View Post
    From what I can find, and from what I understand, the 44-40, being a rifle cartridge, performs best out of a rifle when the appropriate rifle powder is used to it's fullest extent. So yes, when loaded as a revolver cartridge, or when other "pistol cartridges" are loaded for use in rifles with pistol powders, they are inferior...the pistol "sized" rifle dash cartridges are superior for long distance (200 to 300 yards) and accuracy. "Accuracy" based on Townsend Whelen's 1920 data.

    However, if you look at those Hornady Leverevolution rifle loads I mentioned, a correctly loaded 44-40 (and even the 38-40 respectively) can be superior when loaded correctly, NOT HV loads.



    357 Magnum 140gr LeverRevolution
    Range Velocity Energy Trajectory Come Up (MOA) Come Up (MILS) Wind Drift Wind Drift (MOA) Wind Drift (MILS)
    0 1440 645 -1.5 0 0 0 0 0
    100 1154 414 0 0 0 0 0 0
    200 992 306 -24.6 11.7 3.4 0 0 0
    300 895 249 -84.4 26.8 7.8 0 0 0
    400 821 209 -187.6 44.8 13 0 0 0
    500 759 179 -342.7 65.4 19 0 0 0

    44 Magnum 225gr LeveRevolution
    Range Velocity Energy Trajectory Come Up (MOA) Come Up (MILS) Wind Drift Wind Drift (MOA) Wind Drift (MILS)
    0 1410 993 -1.5 0 0 0 0 0
    100 1102 607 0 0 0 0 0 0
    200 947 448 -26.9 12.9 3.7 0 0 0
    300 849 360 -92.6 29.5 8.6 0 0 0
    400 774 299 -206.5 49.3 14.3 0 0 0
    500 709 251 -378.9 72.3 21 0 0 0


    45 Colt 225gr LeveRevolution
    Range Velocity Energy Trajectory Come Up (MOA) Come Up (MILS) Wind Drift Wind Drift (MOA) Wind Drift (MILS)
    0 960 460 -1.5 0 0 0 0 0
    100 855 366 0 0 0 0 0 0
    200 776 301 -46 22 6.4 0 0 0
    300 708 251 -149.9 47.7 13.9 0 0 0
    400 649 210 -323.5 77.2 22.5 0 0 0
    500 594 177 -580 110.7 32.2 0 0 0


    Range Velocity Energy
    300, 900 to 950, 390 to 412, 217gr 44-40 correctly loaded for rifle use.

    Ok so you’re saying 44-40 can be superior. When loaded PROPERLY. Properly meaning a rifle load and not a pistol loading.
    In what exactly?
    Accuracy?
    Energy?
    Velocity?

  8. #148
    Boolit Bub BoBSavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael J. Spangler View Post
    Ok so you’re saying 44-40 can be superior. - All three - YES
    When loaded PROPERLY. - YES
    Properly meaning a rifle load and not a pistol loading. CORRECT

    In what exactly? - RIFLE...to include the modern Winchester 73's

    Accuracy? - YES
    Energy? - YES, pending bullet weight, muzzle velocity and impact velocity at a given range.
    Velocity? - YES, at longer distances. The 38-40 and 44-40 bullet profiles are a bit more aerodynamic than the typical 357-44 mag types.
    You may have already noticed that Hornady dropped the bullet weights for the 45 Colt and 44 Magnum for their LeverRevolution loads. Again, it is about rifle vs revolver....and referring to rifle performance....and what the shooter is looking for in performance.

    For a Winchester 73', my choices in order and why would be

    Rifle-38-40 - flatter trajectory
    Rifle-44-40 - long distance performance (300 yards)
    Rifle-44 Magnum - longer distances (150 yards)- 225gr
    Carbine-44 Magnum - up close and personal - 240gr
    Carbine-45 Colt - up close but not as personal - 250gr
    Carbine-357 Magnum - a slight extension of a handgun
    Carbine-38 Special - plinking

  9. #149
    Boolit Master


    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,113
    Quote Originally Posted by BoBSavage View Post
    You may have already noticed that Hornady dropped the bullet weights for the 45 Colt and 44 Magnum for their LeverRevolution loads. Again, it is about rifle vs revolver....and referring to rifle performance....and what the shooter is looking for in performance.

    For a Winchester 73', my choices in order and why would be

    Rifle-38-40 - flatter trajectory
    Rifle-44-40 - long distance performance (300 yards)
    Rifle-44 Magnum - longer distances (150 yards)- 225gr
    Carbine-44 Magnum - up close and personal - 240gr
    Carbine-45 Colt - up close but not as personal - 250gr
    Carbine-357 Magnum - a slight extension of a handgun
    Carbine-38 Special - plinking

    Please quantify the 38-40 and 44-40 loads with bullet weights and velocity.

  10. #150
    Boolit Bub BoBSavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael J. Spangler View Post
    Please quantify the 38-40 and 44-40 loads with bullet weights and velocity.
    PM sent

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check