On the Browning .22 Hornet thread, I mention all the Browning low walls I've owned (22 Hornet, .223, 243 Rem, 260 Rem, .357 Mag). These were all purchased in the '90s, I've sold all but the Hornet & .357 mag, and it's been a while since I did any "activity," other than shooting, of course. They all were/are fantastically accurate and gorgeous to look at and shoot.
So when my neighbor was bragging about his new Win High Wall "Traditional" in 38-55 and pointed out a "Trapper" model in the same caliber, I couldn't resist. It's a cute lil thing....but at 6.5 lbs, glad I didn't buy it in 45-70. Miroku-made, like all the Brownings.
There was no information in the box nor on-line concerning bore/groove diameter, nor twist. I called Winchester/Browning and a nice lady told me it was built in 2003 (wonder why it took so long to get on the market?), had a 1-15" twist and groove diameter was .379".
But on the various bullet maker sites, there's a plethora of 38-55 bullets in various diameters. Obviously, I want to get the best bullet, so I slugged my barrel.
Well, well, well. No wonder all you guys keep telling us to slug our barrels. Mine came out with at .376". And my friend's slugged the same, even though it was made some 11 years later. Choosing a .377" bullet vs. a .380" could make a big difference, in pressure, for example.
When we called Winchester back, they explained that the rifling buttons become worn, but they're continued to be used within an "acceptable" range. Well, OK....but it would be nice if the manufacturers had it tucked away on their websites somewhere.
I'm not going to go back and slug all my firearms. But I will some.
Hmmm.....there's that Marlin 45-70 LTD with Micro-groove rifling....wonder what bore diameter it really is?!