Load DataReloading EverythingRepackboxTitan Reloading
Snyders JerkyLee PrecisionInline FabricationMidSouth Shooters Supply
RotoMetals2 Wideners
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 61 to 79 of 79

Thread: What kind of flux do you prefer and why

  1. #61
    Boolit Master ballistim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    where rocks are shot at & milk jugs, too...
    Posts
    945
    My table saw is about 20' away from my smelting set-up, kinda made my decision pretty easy to try it, has worked better for me than anything else. I also use paint sticks or cut myself stirring sticks from scraps when using my table saw, and save all the sawdust for smelting, both pine & hardwood, both work well for me. Stirring with a stick is dual purpose as it cleans the sides & bottom of the pot while adding carbon so its a win-win situation.
    “Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."

    Winston S. Churchill


  2. #62
    Boolit Grand Master
    btroj's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Nebraska's oldest city
    Posts
    12,418
    Be careful scraping the bottom of the pot with a stick, it is easy to get bits of charred wood stuck in the valve. Been there, done that. I no longer stir with a stick for that reason.
    You will learn far more at the casting, loading, and shooting bench than you ever will at a computer bench.

  3. #63
    Boolit Master ballistim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    where rocks are shot at & milk jugs, too...
    Posts
    945
    Quote Originally Posted by btroj View Post
    Be careful scraping the bottom of the pot with a stick, it is easy to get bits of charred wood stuck in the valve. Been there, done that. I no longer stir with a stick for that reason.
    So have I! I only do that now in my large smelting pot using a ladle to pour into ingots. I use a layer of sawdust on the surface of my Lee 20# pot when casting to prevent surface oxidation. Good advice on the stirring on the bottom of a bottom pour pot, had to drain a full pot when the valve stuck-no fun indeed!
    “Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."

    Winston S. Churchill


  4. #64
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    sulphur springs, Tx
    Posts
    1,243
    Used pecan hulls last couple of casting sessions for fluxing and they worked great.

  5. #65
    Banned



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Color Me Gone
    Posts
    8,401
    I am all for thrift, but in my opinion, when you have pine pet bedding or pine kitty litter available for so little, why resort to anything else? I doubt anything will work better for smelting and most everything else will be less effective. If you cannot afford $4.00 to $7.00 for a lifetime supply, I understand.

  6. #66
    Banned


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    29˚68’27”N, 99˚12’07”W
    Posts
    14,662
    Quote Originally Posted by leftiye View Post
    I use kingsford's. Wood charcoal ("real") never crossed my mind. I don't see the issue with having it "burn down to carbon". It IS carbon, when it burns down it is ash. Ash is only good for keeping the air away from the melt's surface. The whole issue with all of this is to use something chemically more "active" than lead (and antimony and tin) that can wrest the oxygen off of the lead (etc) oxides. Carbon works, and is available. Other thangs will also work, but all of the common reducers contain carbon, and there are a truckload of alternatives. In the present case compare the charcoal to a simple piece of wood used to stir the melt. It fluxes as it stirs. The wood burns due to the heat and takes the oxygen away from the lead. It's the burning down where the fluxing happens. Once burned down the carbon is all turned into CO2.
    You're talking about reducing, not fluxing. Anything will reduce. Wax, oil, resin, anything that will burn and support the exchange of electrons that shift oxygen atoms from one compound to another. the carbon is to remove UN-reduced oxides of zinc, aluminum, calcium, etc. out of the melt. If they're reduced too and already in suspension, you aren't getting them out again with carbon until they re-oxidize.

    Gear

  7. #67
    Boolit Grand Master

    gwpercle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana
    Posts
    9,298
    Quote Originally Posted by jmortimer View Post
    I am all for thrift, but in my opinion, when you have pine pet bedding or pine kitty litter available for so little, why resort to anything else? I doubt anything will work better for smelting and most everything else will be less effective. If you cannot afford $4.00 to $7.00 for a lifetime supply, I understand.
    Don't get so frugal that you try used kitty litter (as in used by the kitty) that's a smell you wont soon forget. I know there is probably some chemical compound in kitty urine that is good for fluxing but you have to draw the frugality line somewhere.

  8. #68
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,720
    I "think" Kingsford charcoal is compressed of wood product AND bituminous coal. You can buy true wood charcoal of various quality. Vegetative matter like sawdust or nut hulls that have not been pre-charred should perform better as the charring process will pull oxygen from the metallic oxides and the resins in them (that will be lost in the charcoal process) will help bind the impurities.

    On the lighter side, try marijuana buds. Wow, man, like, that really -- uh, er, what were we talk'n 'bout?????

    Rooster

  9. #69
    Banned


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    29˚68’27”N, 99˚12’07”W
    Posts
    14,662
    I don't know, but suddenly I'm craving Chee-tos and I don't know why.

    Gear

  10. #70
    Boolit Master

    leebuilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    1,029
    Too funny. Used some potato chip/crumbs from the bottom of the bag once. Worked great, took me a while to figure out how fluxing works. I use saw dust and wax scraps, you just have to let it work with stirring and scraping.

  11. #71
    Boolit Grand Master leftiye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sagebrush flats, Utah
    Posts
    5,543
    Quote Originally Posted by geargnasher View Post
    You're talking about reducing, not fluxing. Anything will reduce. Wax, oil, resin, anything that will burn and support the exchange of electrons that shift oxygen atoms from one compound to another. the carbon is to remove UN-reduced oxides of zinc, aluminum, calcium, etc. out of the melt. If they're reduced too and already in suspension, you aren't getting them out again with carbon until they re-oxidize. Gear
    Sounds to me like everybody else is talking about reducing too. "If they're reduced too" they aren't oxides any more. True fluxing is simply an aid to skimming (think Marvelux).
    We need somebody/something to keep the government (cops and bureaucrats too) HONEST (by non government oversight).

    Every "freedom" (latitude) given to government is a loophole in the rule of law. Every loophole in the rule of law is another hole in our freedom. When they even obey the law that is. Too often government seems to feel itself above the law.

    We forgot to take out the trash in 2012, but 2016 was a charm! YESSS!

  12. #72
    Boolit Grand Master
    btroj's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Nebraska's oldest city
    Posts
    12,418
    Actually, sawdust does both. It chars and burns on a low order producing lots of carbon monoxide. Carbon monoxide is a great reducing agent. Once the wood chars it forms a substance that has lots of capability to adsorb things, things like the stuff we want gone. It holds on to them so when we skim he charred remains of the sawdust we also remove the impurities.

    A wax does the reducing but it doesn't adsorb anything. Marvelux just removes everything, no reduction.

    With a substance as cheap and universal as sawdust why use anything else? Well, technically I am using pet bedding but same thing essentially.
    You will learn far more at the casting, loading, and shooting bench than you ever will at a computer bench.

  13. #73
    Black Powder 100%


    cajun shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Livingston, La. 20 miles east of Baton Rouge, La.
    Posts
    4,416
    I have like most tried a bunch of different things to use as a smelting flux. The best by far has been wood shavings, not sawdust, The shavings form a very good carbon pile that will clean anything that I've ever smelted. A member on this forum sold boxes of the stuff until a family problem put him out of business. His shavings were from spruce and they gave off a great smell. Later Fairshake.
    Shooter of the "HOLY BLACK" SASS 81802 AKA FAIRSHAKE; NRA ; BOLD; WARTHOG;Deadwood Marshal;Bayou Bounty Hunter; So That his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat; 44 WCF filled to the top, 210 gr. bullet

  14. #74
    Vendor Sponsor

    Smoke4320's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Right here ..at least I was a minute ago
    Posts
    5,049
    Cedar dog bed shaving work well and to me a great smell
    a huge bag (many years supply ) will cost $4.00 to $8.00
    [SIZE=4][B]Selling Hi Quality Powdercoating Powder

    I carry a Nuke50 because cleaning up the mess is Silly !!

    http://www.bing.com/search?q=nuke50&...7ADE&FORM=QBLH

    I am not crazy my mom had me tested

    Theres a fine line between genius and crazy .. I'm that line
    and depending on the day I might just step over that line !!!

  15. #75
    Banned



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Color Me Gone
    Posts
    8,401
    I would research Cedar smoke before inhaling/enjoying it. My conclusion, Cedar shavings not for me.

  16. #76
    Boolit Grand Master



    cbrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kalifornia Escapee
    Posts
    8,034
    For those that like to use a wood stick to stir and scrape the sides/bottom of the pot here's a word of warning. Your intent is to flux, i.e. clean the alloy however that stick will char under the surface, the charred pieces can/will flake off under the surface and become trapped there. They then go out the bottom spout or get picked up with the ladle and cause inclusions in your bullets. Yes, the charred pieces are much lighter than lead but lead is dense enough to trap and hold them under the surface.

    Stirring flux around on the surface of the melt will do a fine job of cleaning the surface of the melt but will do nothing for all the rest of the alloy in the pot. Proper fluxing means using a ladle or spoon to bring the alloy up to the surface and pouring it through the flux and continuing to do so until all of the alloy has been cleaned. Proper fluxing takes time & patience to be done correctly and done well.

    Rick
    "The people never give up their freedom . . . Except under some delusion." Edmund Burke

    "Let us remember that if we suffer tamely a lawless attack on our liberty, we encourage it." Samuel Adams

    NRA Benefactor Life Member
    CRPA Life Member

  17. #77
    Moderator Emeritus


    georgerkahn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    South of the (Canada) border
    Posts
    3,089
    I concur with cbrick (Rick) re methodology; I use a two-step procedure: Step ONE is when I take wheel-weights and "whatever" which is melted over propane in my DCROCKETT pot -- where I vigorously flux with pine sawdust from under my table saw. The results are poured into ingots. Step TWO is when I'm preparing to make boolits, where these ingots -- plus RotoMetal tin and or super-hard is added -- all in an RCBS Pro-Melt, where I again flux with Marvelux and a bit of the red carnuba wax on Gouda cheese. This works for me...
    georgerkahn

  18. #78
    Boolit Master
    JWFilips's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northeastern part of Penn's Woods near Slocum Hollow.
    Posts
    1,920
    My procedure: Super clean the alloy ingots with flux ( sawdust) a number of times in the smelt. Then only these clean ingots in the bottom pour pot with only the use of a redutant ( bees wax) to get the tin back in... No carbon No Wood stir sticks = perfection in the dropped cast boolits....Very simple Very easy! I learned this from the "Masters" here! Yes and **** can get easily stuck in the bottom of the pot under the weight of the alloy! It does not come to the surface easily!!! Once you know this you will learn never to put **** alloy in your pot nor stir the bottom of a bottom pour pot with a carbonized stick!

    I just love the way this site censors stuff! Krap is close to **** There is a lot worse here!
    Last edited by JWFilips; 01-28-2015 at 09:54 PM.
    " Associate with men of good quality, if you esteem your own reputation: for it is better to be alone than in bad company. " George Washington

  19. #79
    Boolit Grand Master



    cbrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kalifornia Escapee
    Posts
    8,034
    We concur right up to and right before you mentioned Marvacrap. Anyone tried to bring any of that onto my property much less into my shop there will be a heck of a fight.

    Aside from being extremely hydroscopic, aside from how horribly it gunk's up the pot and all tools is the fact that it removes all and any oxidation at the surface. Zero reducing of tin or antimony or anything else, truly nasty stuff. I use sawdust in the smelting pot and in the casting pot. Cleans and reduces. No, sawdust in the casting pot will not cause inclusions in your bullets unless you do something intentional to force it below the surface. Stirring with a wood stick can/will do this.

    Rick
    "The people never give up their freedom . . . Except under some delusion." Edmund Burke

    "Let us remember that if we suffer tamely a lawless attack on our liberty, we encourage it." Samuel Adams

    NRA Benefactor Life Member
    CRPA Life Member

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check