RepackboxLee PrecisionWidenersSnyders Jerky
Reloading EverythingRotoMetals2Load DataMidSouth Shooters Supply
Titan Reloading Inline Fabrication
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 83

Thread: WARNING- High Soap Lubes= Hydroscopic Lube

  1. #41
    Boolit Grand Master
    btroj's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Nebraska's oldest city
    Posts
    12,418


    Notice the comment regarding the fact sodium greases tend to emulsify with water but have inherent rust prevention properties.

    Emulsification could be an issue with a wheel bearing. A wheel bearing creates an emulsion because the grease and water are in contact while also being acted upon by a sheer force. That is a great way to create an emulsion.

    I don't plan to grease my car with this stuff. Making an observation and taking it out of context doesn't cut it with me.

    I keep my lube in baggies or closed containers in a dry environment. I don't store ammo where it gets wet or is exposed to sheer forces.

    I suppose that if I load ammo with very low case tension and hold it under water while turning the bullet in the case I could have an issue......

    Context guys, context. Not really different than saying lead is a toxin so we shouldn't handle it. It is all in the manner of use.

  2. #42
    Boolit Master Eutectic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    607
    Quote Originally Posted by Marlin Junky View Post
    All soaps are not equal regarding their affinity toward moisture absorption; i.e, sodium soap (e.g. Ivory) is more hydroscopic than Lithium soap.
    MJ
    We fight.... We debate..... We back bite..... All in the name of "hydroscopic" There is no such word!!!!!! Whether it be in this thread or even the title!!!!!

    I find fighting over a non-existent word ridiculous!!

    HYGROSCOPIC HYGROSCOPIC HYGROSCOPIC HYGROSCOPIC HYGROSCOPIC .........

    Please know of what you speak!

    Eutectic

  3. #43
    Boolit Master Marlin Junky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,623
    OK, so what can happen to the emulsion after influenced by 20K pounds of pressure? Context?? Why is it so hard to find sodium based greases anymore?

    I don't care what lube anyone else uses either but there's no reason to immediately dismiss someone's opinion if it's contradictory to one's own. I expect that level of intolerance in Pinko rhetoric but I thought this was a bunch of open minded guys with a collective sense of humor... guess I was mistaken.

    MJ
    It's not about gun control, it's about people control. The progressives are using terrorists and the insane to further their agenda. If the socialist news media wasn't complicit, we could sit back and watch Fast & Furious and Benghazi-gate unfold.

  4. #44
    Boolit Master Marlin Junky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,623
    Quote Originally Posted by Eutectic View Post
    We fight.... We debate..... We back bite..... All in the name of "hydroscopic" There is no such word!!!!!! Whether it be in this thread or even the title!!!!!

    I find fighting over a non-existent word ridiculous!!

    HYGROSCOPIC HYGROSCOPIC HYGROSCOPIC HYGROSCOPIC HYGROSCOPIC .........

    Please know of what you speak!

    Eutectic
    Thank you... I'm typing quickly because I got to get back to work... thank you. The meaning was still there, somewhere; i.e., the affinity toward water.

    MJ

    P.S:

    hydroscope (ˈhaɪdrəˌskəʊp)

    — n
    any instrument for making observations of underwater objects

    hydroscopic

    — adj

    Last edited by Marlin Junky; 06-23-2013 at 07:50 PM.
    It's not about gun control, it's about people control. The progressives are using terrorists and the insane to further their agenda. If the socialist news media wasn't complicit, we could sit back and watch Fast & Furious and Benghazi-gate unfold.

  5. #45
    Boolit Grand Master
    btroj's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Nebraska's oldest city
    Posts
    12,418
    Technically it is an affinity for water but I digress.

    Why aren't soap greases found often these days? Because better greases exist for the purposes sodium greases where used for in the past.

    Sodium isn't as good as lithium for wheel bearing but I am not lubing wheel bearings, am I?

    You fail to notice that under anything even close to normal loading procedures a sodium grease/water emulsion can not form. Period.

    I don't store my bullets in or near water. I don't store my loaded ammo there either.

    Like powder and primers I keep my bullets and lube in cool, dry conditions.

    I can assume you don't use any grease on your rifles Don? Adding a grit to grease is how arrives are often formed, don't you know?

    See what happens when we extrapolate a substance into an arena in which those conditions won't exist? I don't store my MML in sand but if I did it would quickly lap my bore.

    Yes, sodium greases in SOME conditions have been shown to have an affinity FOR water. They still retain an inherent ability to prevent rust. They also require exposure to water to have this even become an issue.

    My suggestion- don't lube your wheel bearing with bullet lube.

  6. #46
    Boolit Master Marlin Junky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,623
    Quote Originally Posted by btroj View Post
    Yes, sodium greases in SOME conditions have been shown to have an affinity FOR water. They still retain an inherent ability to prevent rust. They also require exposure to water to have this even become an issue.
    Ok, ok FOR... I'm not proofing this ****. Like you've never made a typo before!

    Anything that blocks oxidation can be said to "retain an inherent ability to prevent rust".

    It doesn't matter anymore... if you've tested it and firmly believe you'll never have a corrosion issue, then fine... have a good evening.

    MJ
    It's not about gun control, it's about people control. The progressives are using terrorists and the insane to further their agenda. If the socialist news media wasn't complicit, we could sit back and watch Fast & Furious and Benghazi-gate unfold.

  7. #47
    In Remembrance
    oneokie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Jackson County, Choctaw Nation, Indian Territory
    Posts
    4,873
    Quote Originally Posted by 1500FPS View Post
    I see three camp and the third being the Moderators. I have seen no swearing and no derogatory name calling and yet the moderators are here hanging the cloud of doom over the thread as so often happens in many other threads. Has Castboolits gotten to the point where you cannot even argue? What is next not allowed to debate?

    Please don't close the threads that are just passionate discussions.
    We are here to keep things civil. Debating, discussing, and the sharing of diverse ideas is what the basic tenent of this site is about.
    Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it.

    “A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity”. Sigmund
    Freud

  8. #48
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    613
    I've been watching this thread with interest, hoping to learn something. So far, I am, some of it reinforces what I already knew, just expanded it to the application if boolit lube.

    My thoughts are "if you don't like it, don't use it" and please don't crab or sharp shoot because your favorite ox got gored.

    Me, I've got an open mind, but will probably stick to traditional type lubes. I just can't feature powder coating yet. I do swage boolits (and jacketed bullets). Going to try knurling swaged lead boolits then tumble lubing them.

    By the way, I do grease 2 of my rifles, as you don't lube them with oil, either grease them or run them dry (surface oiled and wiped clean). I use a touch of grease on 2 of my handguns too, as it's the best lube.

  9. #49
    Banned


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    29˚68’27”N, 99˚12’07”W
    Posts
    14,662
    Quote Originally Posted by btroj View Post
    Oh, I don't think they are borderline. I don't either. I've been putting up with bullying and being ridiculed here by a certain few people, particularly for lube experiments, for well over a year and am sick of it. This is not a battle of egos or a peeing contest as it seems to appear to the staff, it is a battle of bullies vs. nerds.

    What we actually want is a lube that works as well at low temps as it does at high temps. Nothing else. Well, a few other things too . It's a challenge. It's been fun except for the trolling, and it's also turning out to be quite productive.

    If the final recipe has soap or not isn't of concern to ANY of the "3 amigos" or theirs friends. We are after a RESULT, not a recipe. Correct for me too. I don't care if BHO invents it, if it does what I want I'm going to use it.

    So far we have had some excellent results with the high soap lubes. They are working far better than anything with a wax base. Due to summer temps the cold end testing will need to wait for winter. We do have one guy doing some cooler weather testing and it seems promising. And some high-velocity testing yet to come. Some hecklers have been complaining that 2K fps disqualifies this lube as extreme. Velocity isn't the whole bag. First we have to make it handle extreme temperatures without hardening or MELTING, then work out the other bugs. I already have plenty of lubes that give me excellent accuracy at very high velocity, but they don't handle well in the field. Extreme lube, like Hodgdon's Extreme rifle powder, is being developed to perform consistently in extreme weather. Extreme velocity variations is another consideration, but not the only one.

    None of the future results will be posted here in all likelihood. Won't be posted by me at all unless the name calling, slander, and attempts to discredit, belittle, whine, gripe, and cajol stops permanently. The trolling and baiting has gotten old. We were merely trying to have an open sharing of ideas. [B]And we were. But some members just can't stand a good drama-free, open discussion about successes and failures and things to try next. [B] That appears to ruffle some feather so the best we could do was go underground. I've "gone underground" because I can't get a word in edgewise here about lube without the naysayers crawling out of the woodwork. We've had and discussed legitimate concerns with lube ingredients, and a variety of other topics just fine, I know that neither you (Brad), Runfiverun or I have any ego problems about any particular lube ingredient. The proof is in the testing, period. The problem with this thread here is nobody has had any rusted guns on account of soap lube, it is only a topic posted by someone to stir the pot. This sort of pot-stirring is exactly what I've been fighting seems like forever here and I'm finally had a gut full of it. You can see how much I've been posting here in the last month, if I said half of what I really wanted to I'd get banned on the spot.

    Those who are the issue know who they are. We meant no harm or insult to the board or anyone else. Absolutely right. I haven't done a single thing to cause this, but have tried to defend myself. I've asked before if anyone has issue with something I say (yes, I can be impatient and "short" sometimes), TO TAKE IT UP WITH ME, because I probably didn't realize it. I've apologized to more than one person on this board, I don't come here to be a jackwagon and hurt people's feelings intentionally. I come here to LEARN. I come here to SHARE. I come here to forward the craft of cast boolit shooting and to resurrect so much of what has been lost through time and historical lapses in interest. I don't come here to start fights, pick on people, or gain a sense of ego by belittling others. It's not my style. If anyone has their doubts about that, I have over 12K posts here for you to go read through. You'll quickly see what kind of person I am, and why I'm here (except for the past few days ) where I've been stooping to the level of the trolls. We have simply come to a point where the nasty comments and harassment have become intolerable. That happened for me about two months ago. Ask Ken about that one.

    If anyone has a desire to know what we are doing currently then simply ask via PM. I probably won't be here much, so please don't PM me. I waded through a dozen help requests and thank-you's and progress updates from some of the good folks here trying to learn while I was gone. I'm sorry but until I can help in open forum again without being harrassed nobody's going to be seeing much of me here.

    I speak solely for myself. The others involved may or may not agree with me. I do not speak for the others.
    Well, that pretty much covers it. I noticed that as usual the hecklers also come in threes. I want the staff to pay particular attention to the three who have come to this thread to do nothing but disparage we "amigos". Particularly the last one. Word gets around in certain circles, it's like there's a troll feed on and they start showing up.

    And lastly, I ask the staff to seriously look at the "factions" involved here, examine the motivations, and examine the value contributed to the forum by all involved. Runfiverun, Btroj, and I don't come here to start fights. Lately we've been having to finish a lot of them and are having to step over the line occasionally to do so. We don't like it. Staff doesn't understand what we've been having to deal with to make valuable contributions to the forum because all you notice is when we've been pushed to the point of being so mad at this being allowed to happen that we take it into our own hands as a basic right of self-defense. Then we get reprimanded and edited, while the real offenders do not. A great number of valuable, contributing members have been run off the same way we are being run off, and in some instances by the same people. Ignore lists aren't going to solve it, some people are expert at being impossible to ignore. Ignore lists are fine for people in a peeing match, but not for those actively stalking, baiting, trolling and hoping to catch others as if it were a sport. If someone is antagonizing someone else here to the point that the ignore feature should be used, somebody needs to get shown the door.

    Gear

  10. #50
    Banned


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    29˚68’27”N, 99˚12’07”W
    Posts
    14,662
    Quote Originally Posted by 357maximum View Post
    Ya got me there 1500FPS....I served this board for several years as a moderator, and I entered the cure all end all lube thread just to cause trouble.....damn I have been found out.

    I tried to help, my help was not wanted...pure and simple and now I can rest at ease knowing that I tried and it was not a good enough effort...oh well. I guess I will just go and follow some other members lead and simply fade into the darkness....I am not wanted here.....and I know when to say **** it and carry on.
    I was going to leave this alone, and still probably should, but I can't let it go for the sake of those who aren't going to plow through 2400 posts to find the truth.

    You had a slight curiosity and an ulterior motive both for entering the EL thread. The curiosity is natural, you're like the rest of us trying to make a better moustrap. You gave it a helluva go a few years back and came up with something that works great for you, unfortunately not so good for everyone who doesn't live in a place with weather like you have. Somehow you seem to take that "failure" way to personally. It isn't a failure if it serves YOU, now is it? I've made your lube and it does what you say it does in the winters here, but I'm looking for something that does it all, as are quite a few people. Now for the ulterior motive. This has to do with you and Starmetal from way back, and the peeing match you two got into over lubes and whose was best, and a whole bunch of other things you two fought about. You were fine until I came up with a sample of Starmetal's new soap lube and discovered that it really was the bees knees. You discovered that Starmetal and I had become friends and you started doing everything in your power to get some of his lube, but I wouldn't give you any because he knew what you were up to and told me not to. You know what you were up to. That's when you threw off the guise and started calling it "secret squirrel lube" and mangling it's inventor's name, and then slandering me and a few others all over this forum. It was nothing short of a temper tantrum. In fact, you "banned" yourself for a while, pulled down your avatar pic, etc. Thanks for the help trying to figure out what it was, or at least what was wrong with SL-61 (never mind, we figured that out on our own).

    Now remember, Runfiverun and I labored for many pages to help you figure out how to make the stuff we were trying to make in an effort to duplicate Starmetal's lube. Remember all the pictures I posted for you? You FINALLY listened and got the soap hot enough to melt like we'd been trying to tell you to do, and you went and shot some of it. It didn't do well. We tried to help you figure it out so we could all learn what was failing and fix it, but you threw in the towel and started cursing us for saying it would work (it did early on) and then it had problems. You weren't at all interested in fixing it. Then your friend Badgeredd comes in and posts two targets supposedly proving that for the end of time MML is better than SL-61. What kind of joke is that for proof? We're trying to do something productive here, and if THAT sort of stuff is what you think is helping, I'm so very sorry I wasted pages of the thread and so much time trying to help you figure out how to melt soap. Some other hecklers showed up about that time and started derailing the thread. It took me a week with staff to get stuff deleted and things straightened out so the "thread" of the thread could meander on in a positive direction. You and a few others were all about being the problem, and nothing about being the solution, so no, you DID NOT help us in any way, and YES, your tantrums and negativity are not wanted. Your insults are not wanted (three amigos, three stooges, internet commandos, keyboard commandos, Gear's glop, etc. etc. etc.). Nobody asked you for help, you volunteered and all you did was make a mess when things didn't go your way.

    So yes, please do follow my lead and fade into darkness so those bright lights who have the interest, endurance, and objectivity needed to complete a difficult scientific undertaking (YES, big, scientific words like "stearate", "polyalphaolefin", and "tribology" might be necessary so the participants know what the heck each other are talking about, sorry if that bothers you, it's not a big-word show-off competition like you seem to think it is) can do so without you getting in the way.

    But I know you won't fade away, just like your latest self-banning signature line that lasted an afternoon, you have too much fun making people miserable here to miss out.

    Gear

  11. #51
    Banned




    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pa
    Posts
    1,184
    If you feed the trolls they will continue trolling. My suggestion each ignore one another and move on with life. I for one have been watching the lube threads here with great interest and find them very informative. If you have nothing productive to say then do not say anything. If you have a issue you have found that might helps someone else by all means post it. Just because someone posts a criticism does not mean it is a personal attack, maybe we are all getting a little thin skinned around one another. I am sick of the personal jabs at each other and i will be moving forward and acting accordingly. I would hope you men can do the same and lets get back to sharing knowledge and not wasting 30 posts of a 50 post thread on bickering.

    ANdy

  12. #52
    Moderator Emeritus


    JonB_in_Glencoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    15,886
    Quote Originally Posted by btroj View Post
    ...None of the future results will be posted here in all likelihood. The trolling and baiting has gotten old. We were merely trying to have an open sharing of ideas. That appears to ruffle some feather so the best we could do was go underground.
    while I almost never post in these Lube threads, I do follow them. This is a sad state of affairs, for sure. Yeah sometimes some words are over my head, but I can get the gist of what is going on with the experimenting. It'd be a shame if it goes underground due this kind of activity.
    Jon
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun.”
    ― The Dalai Lama, Seattle Times, May 2001

  13. #53
    Boolit Grand Master JIMinPHX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Moving back east now
    Posts
    5,089
    Quote Originally Posted by runfiverun View Post
    anhydrous lanolin contains water as an ingredient.
    I was under the impression that the word "anhydrous" indicated that water was not present.
    “an armed society is a polite society.”
    Robert A. Heinlein

    "Idque apud imperitos humanitas vocabatur, cum pars servitutis esset."
    Publius Tacitus

  14. #54
    Boolit Grand Master
    btroj's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Nebraska's oldest city
    Posts
    12,418
    Anhydrous lanolin, according to USP, may contain no more than .25 percent water. It isn't entire gone but is in very low amounts.

  15. #55
    Boolit Buddy Driver man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Hutt Valley New Zealand
    Posts
    487
    It's not strictly true that there's no such word as hydroscopic - it means "of, or pertaining to, a hydroscope".

    Where a hydroscope is "any instrument for making observations of underwater objects".
    Quote Originally Posted by Eutectic View Post
    We fight.... We debate..... We back bite..... All in the name of "hydroscopic" There is no such word!!!!!! Whether it be in this thread or even the title!!!!!

    I find fighting over a non-existent word ridiculous!!

    HYGROSCOPIC HYGROSCOPIC HYGROSCOPIC HYGROSCOPIC HYGROSCOPIC .........

    Please know of what you speak!

    Eutectic
    The Bird of Time has but a little way
    To fly-and Lo! the bird is on the wing

  16. #56
    Boolit Grand Master JIMinPHX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Moving back east now
    Posts
    5,089
    Quote Originally Posted by btroj View Post
    Anhydrous lanolin, according to USP, may contain no more than .25 percent water. It isn't entire gone but is in very low amounts.
    Is that enough to cause trouble? Might a percentage that low be bound to the carrier well enough that it isn't able to react with other substances around it? I'm asking because I don't know. I resemble a chemist about as much as I resemble the typical PETA fanatic.
    “an armed society is a polite society.”
    Robert A. Heinlein

    "Idque apud imperitos humanitas vocabatur, cum pars servitutis esset."
    Publius Tacitus

  17. #57
    Banned 1500FPS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    106
    Quote Originally Posted by JIMinPHX View Post
    Is that enough to cause trouble? Might a percentage that low be bound to the carrier well enough that it isn't able to react with other substances around it? I'm asking because I don't know. I resemble a chemist about as much as I resemble the typical PETA fanatic.
    Something to think about. The last thing out of the barrel is the burning hot gases. So how much water do you think would be left on the bore after that gas goes by?

  18. #58
    Boolit Grand Master
    btroj's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Nebraska's oldest city
    Posts
    12,418
    If that much water was an issue it would have reared its head in Felix lube by now.

    That water is bound to the chemical structure of the lanolin, it isn't free water just dissolved in the lanolin.

    That is a tiny amount of water when you think about it. Add a teaspoonful of lanolin that contains .25 percent water. That is say 5 grams of lanolin, looking at a few milligrams of water. More water than that enters the barrel if you blow thru it.

    It isn't relevant.

  19. #59
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    soda springs Id.
    Posts
    28,088
    it's nothing.
    #2 chassis grease is about 3-4% water.
    all the lithi-bee lubes would be rusting barrels out left and right if it was a problem.
    many of the lithium stearates take well over 400-f to bind up the poly- alphetic oils they use.

  20. #60
    Banned


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    29˚68’27”N, 99˚12’07”W
    Posts
    14,662
    There is a considerable bit of water in smokeless powder, too. If it is taken away, the powder burn rates get wonky.

    Gear

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check