MiHec 22 Nato Heavy (75 gr. version) brass four & six cavity solid

[dkf]

alsomontanamark mark dot skeels at med dot ge dot com 1 four cavity mold please, thanks.

First time ordering, and new to site, so I guess I really don't know how payment works, when to send, I assume you will post that information when the thread closes and the order is placed. Thanks

From what I gather when the buy is closed and the molds are about ready to ship you get a Paypal invoice sent to your e-mail address. You pay the invoice and then the mold ships shortly after paid. If I am wrong someone will probably correct me. I am new here also.

[dverna]

I am in on this too.

One 6 cavity

dverna001 at aol dot com

[bruce drake]

This boolit mold will allow the caster to use most medium-speed propellants with a minor reduction from listed loads to meet a 2000-2200fps velocity range. If the caster has a really good lube, he might be able to match the same velocity as a jacketed bullet but I think it will work the AR just perfectly with those powders at the regular cast velocities.

[freebullet]

Freebullet #45 on the list. I would like to amend my order. I would like a 6 cavity with handles. Thanks 45 2.1 for all the time you are investing to put these buys together.

[rnhathaway]

I would like a 4 cav mold
rnhathaway(at)triad(dot)rr(dot)com

[Guardian]

Add me to the list for a 6 cav mold, please.

spicket80athotmaildotcom

[HDS]

Question to the designers because of this thread:
http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...-for-the-Ar-15

Is it true what I showed in the last post with the picture? It was only done in photoshop using proportional scaling to get an idea. It seems to me the nose on both the 65 and 75 versions are identical?

The extra length seems to come from another groove and longer driving bands. Which to me says, if a long nose is a bad thing for accuracy and high velocities as is claimed in the thread, that this bullet should be potentially more accurate than the 65gr version? The nose on this bullet makes up less of it's length and mass.

[alamogunr]

Add me to the list for a 4 cavity mold.

alamogunr AT charter DOT net

[45 2.1]

Question to the designers because of this thread:
http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...-for-the-Ar-15
I haven't participated in that thread and won't. I don't deal in supposition.

Is it true what I showed in the last post with the picture? It was only done in photoshop using proportional scaling to get an idea. It seems to me the nose on both the 65 and 75 versions are identical? If you will look in the first post of this thread, you will see what I said about the nose. It is the same because: 1) It is already proven from the original 22 Nato, 2) It won't fit in the magazine if it were longer and 3) The 75 gr. weight has been VERY accommodating with respect to accuracy in the 6x45, a former wildcat of the 5.56 case with the same internal case dimensions. That cartridge has been extensively tested with a BRP mold of my design.

The extra length seems to come from another groove and longer driving bands. Which to me says, if a long nose is a bad thing for accuracy and high velocities as is claimed in the thread, that this bullet should be potentially more accurate than the 65gr version? The nose on this bullet makes up less of it's length and mass. I don't subscribe to most of the thoughts and their authors on that thread. Accuracy has to do with proper design, fit and loading. You can find numerous examples that negate what was said there.

[HDS]

Thanks, I had overlooked the part where you mentioned the nose. I had probably read it, but it did not register in my mind

[Hamish]

B, might as well put me down for this one too,,,,,

Hamish one 3C popeye91 at frontier dot com

(too bad this one couldn't be offered in Cramer HP at some point in the future)

[dg31872]

I read this thread as carefully as my eyes allow, and I can not determine if the four cav. is brass or not. I assume it is, and if it is brass, please put me down for one four cav. If not brass, then I shall take a six cav. brass. Mihec work is superb and worth the wait.

[45 2.1]

I read this thread as carefully as my eyes allow, and I can not determine if the four cav. is brass or not. I assume it is, and if it is brass, please put me down for one four cav. If not brass, then I shall take a six cav. brass. Mihec work is superb and worth the wait.

Yes, it is brass.... as stated in the thread title. I need your disguised e-mail address also.

[dg31872]

You bet!! I would like one four cav. dgd dot 72 dot 2011 at gmail dot com. And thank you.

[swest10]

Put me down for a 6 cavity mold
swest47941 at gmail dot com
Thanks!

[bmiller]

Also amend my order to include handles as well. Thank you

[45 2.1]

Hamish one 3C (too bad this one couldn't be offered in Cramer HP at some point in the future)

Rich, I put you down for a four cavity.... no 3 cavity HP offering as the meplat is quite small.

Thread updated.............

[ohnomrbillk]

Please sign me up for a 6 cavity mold.

william (dot) kinderknecht (at) gmail (dot) com

Thank you

[wb2754]

This is my first group buy. I presume that handles are included in the price, or am I mistaken?

[gmsharps]

Only the mold. Lee handles fit but the MiHec handles are better.

gmsharps