StainLess Steel MediaTitan ReloadingRotoMetals2Graf & Sons
Lee PrecisionBallisti-CastMidSouth Shooters SupplyInline Fabrication
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Browning B92

  1. #1
    Boolit Man
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Salt lake City, Utah
    Posts
    104

    Browning B92

    Anyone have any experiance with Browning B92's in 357 or 44?

    thanks

  2. #2
    Boolit Master helice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California. Where absurdity reigns and confusion makes it look good.
    Posts
    647
    I have one of each. They are wonderful short rifles, very smooth and utterly dependable.

  3. #3
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    326
    Have a 44. Accurate and slick. Goes hunting with me every year.

    Don

  4. #4
    Boolit Master



    M-Tecs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    2,040
    I also have one of each. And I agree that they are wonderful short rifles being very smooth and utterly dependable.

    I do like my 357 better. My 44’s bore measures .433. It shoots jackets fine and I am sure it would shoot proper sized cast well but all of my 44 molds are undersize for this bore.

    The only down side is that they are not a real US made Winchester but I believe they are better made than the US made Winchester 92’s. Better material and better tolerances except for the bore size on the 44.
    Last edited by M-Tecs; 10-10-2012 at 07:21 PM.

  5. #5
    Boolit Master


    williamwaco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dallas Texas
    Posts
    4,540
    I have the Winchester version.

    It is spectacular.

    ( .357 )
    First reload: .22 Hornet. 1956.
    More at: http://reloadingtips.com/

    "Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the
    government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian."
    - Henry Ford

  6. #6
    Boolit Master pietro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    1,433
    Quote Originally Posted by williamwaco View Post
    I have the Winchester version.

    It is spectacular.

    ( .357 )
    FWIW, both the Browning B-92 and the new "Winchester" 92's are made by the same company - Miroku Firearms Co, in Japan.

    Which is why the fit/finish is heads/shoulders above any that came out of the New Haven plant (excepting those from the Winchester Custom Shop, of course).


    .

  7. #7
    Boolit Master


    Lloyd Smale's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    munising Michigan
    Posts
    10,543
    had a 44 that i foolishly let go. Probabably the best fit and finshed lever gun i ever had.
    sixgun junky

  8. #8
    Boolit Master Nobade's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    3,416
    I had a 44 version, same a Mtecs - .433" groove diameter, would only shoot custom bullets with smokeless. I sold that and now have the 357 version. It took me a long time to find a good boolit for smokeless, that one is the Ranch Dog 175. The fat nose fits the long throat and still is short enough to feed.

    Now with black powder it's another matter. Both those rifles work exceedingly well with black. Using the right boolits I had no trouble finding good accurate loads. Presently I am using the 357 for NRA pistol caliber levergun silhouette with the biglube snakebite boolit, 38spl cases, and FFFg black powder. Quite effective and great fun making noise and smoke!

  9. #9
    Boolit Master McLintock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    437
    I've got the .44 and have shot it a lot in Cowboy Action matches, including the long range side matches for pistol caliber rifles, shooting out to 100 yards. I never slugged the bore, but it is very accurate with .430" lead bullets, and the 230 gr Lazer Cast in particular. For the main matches, just a 200 gr .430" did very well. Never have shot it with jacketed bullets. The thing I always like about the Browning's and even the current Winchesters is that they had the proper receiver contour on the bottom, whereas the Rossi's and their decendents had a flatter contour and just never looked right to me, just a personal preference maybe. I put a saddle ring on mine and Lyman tang sight and it's never let me down.
    McLintock

  10. #10
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    443
    I've had the Browning 92 in .44 for quite some time now. Matter of fact it's what led me to Cast Boolits. (my first post if I recall) Anyways, my gripe is the same one all .44 rifle shooters have. The bores on the rifles are oversize as compared to handguns. I've got 3 .44 molds (429244/42930/H&G and none of them shoot fer beans in the Browning. Two of them are tumbling before they even leave the barrel. The bore is .433 so yes the boolits are undersize. Loading hot works better (obturating the boolits to better fill the bore I assume) but recoil becomes objectionable real fast. The sights suck and the front one can't be changed easilly. Fit&finish is excellent by the way! Smooth action...with a 12lb. trigger pull. And none of the boolits cycle thru....have to load it single-shot. And yes, I've seated short...still won't work. I'm gonna give it one more try with Lee's 200gr. rnf cast soft to hard, air-cooled, waterdropped and heat treated and see if I can make it work. At present I've tried 30 different loads/alloys/lubes/treatments and the only good load is horribly abusive with a jacketed bullet. This is probably one of the very few guns I'm gonna sell. Then get a Ruger Blackhawk in .44 so I can use these molds. Not saying it's a bad gun...just a poor decision on bore size and possibly rate of twist. Audie...the Oldfart..

  11. #11
    Moderator


    runfiverun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    soda springs Id.
    Posts
    21,083
    i have the browning also in 44 mag.
    my issue is that it will absolutly not feed anything longer than 1.610.
    1.611 will hang up.
    no big deal i just swage 40 S&W brass into 44- 430 diameter bullets using my 180 gr 357 boolit as a core,and put the canellure to make the oal 1.609.
    it's all an educated guess,,,, till the trigger is pulled.

    the more i find out about shootin boolits, the more it contradicts everything i ever learned about shooting jaxketed.

  12. #12
    Boolit Master Nobade's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    3,416
    Hey oldfart1956, you could always do what I did - have Mountain Molds cut you a mold that fits the rifle. Once I did that it cycled fine and shot accurately. Don't sell yours, I wish I hadn't sold mine and would be upset with myself if I hadn't found a really nice 357 version right after.

    And remember, these things shoot very well with soft boolits and black powder. The kick isn't bad and the accuracy is better than using smokeless.

  13. #13

  14. #14
    Boolit Master DUKE NUKEM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NV, OR, WA
    Posts
    4,829
    I have the SAECO mould and it looks to be to small.

  15. #15
    Boolit Master DUKE NUKEM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NV, OR, WA
    Posts
    4,829
    Let us know if you guys have one you will part with.

  16. #16
    Boolit Master DUKE NUKEM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NV, OR, WA
    Posts
    4,829
    Anyone know what the rate of twist is and what bullet weight would be conducive to the rate of twist?

  17. #17
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    HB, CA, FOR NOW
    Posts
    2,474
    Quote Originally Posted by Lloyd Smale View Post
    had a 44 that i foolishly let go. Probabably the best fit and finshed lever gun i ever had.
    Parallels my own experience precisely. I have one now in 32=20, which I dote on. The 44 got sold because I kept getting leading. With what I know now, I suspect the problem with the 44 was an over-size bore, but cast-boolits was still 15 years in the future, and all I knew came from my old Lyman No 45. Worked well in my 38's and 44 Ruger revolver--didn't have the knowledge to adapt my loading techniques. You can learn here in a few hours reading what took old guys like me 25 years to learn.
    _________________________________________________It's not that I can't spell: it is that I can't type.

  18. #18
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    245
    There seems to have been something in the water with those .44 barrels. Rossi had the same problem for years and a friend has one with a .426 bore/.434 groove.. . . Whose idea was that, anyway? Mediocre with jacketed and "f'getaboutit" with commercial cast. We had good success with soft alloy paper patched sized .001 over groove, but time constraints (big family) kept him from it. We discussed various options like having the bore hard chromed .002 on a side, which would bring it to .430 in the groove with the process set up to favor a slightly heavier plate in the muzzle end, but most places that do custom chrome wouldn't touch it without dismounting the barrel first - guns and paperwork and all that. Now we have a barrel blank and we're going to change it out. I'm told Rossi changed their threads once or twice and what the threads are will have to be discovered, but that's another discussion.

    I can just imagine Rossi's barrel maker scratching his head, wondering why those Americans want their .44 barrels so danged oversize, while we're scratching our heads wondering why they make them so big. Steve, of Steve's Gunz told me that, for some undiscoverable reason, they were deliberately produced at the maximum allowable SAAMI dimensions for .44 mag, but that they have finally gotten the message about bore size in the .44's.

    Other calibers in the Rossi's I've examined seem to be right on the money, including a .44-40 which is right at .428.

  19. #19
    Boolit Master DUKE NUKEM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NV, OR, WA
    Posts
    4,829
    Quote Originally Posted by rintinglen View Post
    Parallels my own experience precisely. I have one now in 32=20, which I dote on. The 44 got sold because I kept getting leading. With what I know now, I suspect the problem with the 44 was an over-size bore, but cast-boolits was still 15 years in the future, and all I knew came from my old Lyman No 45. Worked well in my 38's and 44 Ruger revolver--didn't have the knowledge to adapt my loading techniques. You can learn here in a few hours reading what took old guys like me 25 years to learn.
    I had the same problem with my Winchester 1894 in 44 Magnum

  20. #20
    Boolit Master DUKE NUKEM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NV, OR, WA
    Posts
    4,829
    Quote Originally Posted by yeahbub View Post
    There seems to have been something in the water with those .44 barrels. Rossi had the same problem for years and a friend has one with a .426 bore/.434 groove.. . . Whose idea was that, anyway? Mediocre with jacketed and "f'getaboutit" with commercial cast. We had good success with soft alloy paper patched sized .001 over groove, but time constraints (big family) kept him from it. We discussed various options like having the bore hard chromed .002 on a side, which would bring it to .430 in the groove with the process set up to favor a slightly heavier plate in the muzzle end, but most places that do custom chrome wouldn't touch it without dismounting the barrel first - guns and paperwork and all that. Now we have a barrel blank and we're going to change it out. I'm told Rossi changed their threads once or twice and what the threads are will have to be discovered, but that's another discussion.

    I can just imagine Rossi's barrel maker scratching his head, wondering why those Americans want their .44 barrels so danged oversize, while we're scratching our heads wondering why they make them so big. Steve, of Steve's Gunz told me that, for some undiscoverable reason, they were deliberately produced at the maximum allowable SAAMI dimensions for .44 mag, but that they have finally gotten the message about bore size in the .44's.

    Other calibers in the Rossi's I've examined seem to be right on the money, including a .44-40 which is right at .428.
    Would relining be an option? JonK had good results with it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check