RotoMetals2RepackboxSnyders JerkyReloading Everything
Titan ReloadingMidSouth Shooters SupplyWidenersLee Precision
Inline Fabrication Load Data
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27

Thread: .22 Mag vs the .223

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Saco, Maine
    Posts
    285

    .22 Mag vs the .223

    What are the pluses & Minisus of each. ( Yea I can shoot Deer with the .223)



    Which one would you go for and why?


    Suppose I should go with the .223
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails moose8.gif  
    Last edited by WickedGoodOutdoors; 09-08-2011 at 02:38 PM.

  2. #2
    Boolit Master GabbyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    3,870
    I’d scratch the rim-fire. Would take a close look at the 527 FS chambered in 222 Rem.

    Before I started casting I clipped out an article listing reduced loads under 22 Hornet bullets in the 223 Rem. Still have the clipping here stapled into one of my load books after thirty years.
    They list a couple of 22 magnum rim-fire equivalent loads. 40gr Sierra SP Hornet bullet. 10.0 gr 2400 for 1931 fps and 4.0gr Unique for 1355 fps. I still have some of the Unique loads around here someplace. They shot right to the scope. Bullet impact was obviously getting lower as range went out. Out of my ten pound varmint rifle the bullet impacts just appear in the scopes view shortly after trigger pull. it’s strange. I use cast bullets for low intensity loads now days. The Hornet bullets make an easy load if you don’t want to set up to cast 22’s. I shoot my cast over 14.5gr of 4198 at 2123 fps. Plan to try the old 7 ½ grain of Unique load lit with a pistol primer. If I was in a hurry I could set 223 up on my Dillon 550 and run 350 per hour. Makes 22 mag look expensive at $9.50 per fifty count.

  3. #3
    In Remebrance


    Bret4207's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    St Lawrence Valley, NY
    Posts
    12,924
    You can reload the CF 22's for less than the 22 Mag will cost you.

  4. #4
    Boolit Grand Master
    Mk42gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Butler, MO
    Posts
    9,052
    something good from 100 to 200 yrds that wont make a lot of noise
    This just screams .22 Hornet to me. Of course the .22 Fireball or .222 would work well also.

    Robert

  5. #5
    Boolit Master
    Suo Gan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Middle of the Crook
    Posts
    1,266
    The 223 would be much more versatile all around varmint rifle than a 22 mag.
    Lotta people die in bed: Dangerous place to be!

  6. #6
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Monterey Tennessee
    Posts
    2,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Suo Gan View Post
    The 223 would be much more versatile all around varmint rifle than a 22 mag.
    Ditto, any store sells .223 ammo and cheap military brass can be found most anywhere.
    I love my .22 mags but in your case the .223 is a hands down winner.

  7. #7
    Boolit Buddy TonyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Wasilla, Alaska
    Posts
    140
    +1 for .223


    22lr and 22m (And 17hmr for that matter) are not only very mother nature sensitive (substantial Wind/drift at short ranges etc.), but the 223 ammo availability compared to some of the more exotic .2** calibers, would seem like a no brainer...

    If you are reloading/casting however.... there are better .2** calibers IMO.... especially for the 200yrd range...

    that .222 is pretty impressive. Infact a moose was taken with one just last weekend out of our group (Was to be used as a camp gun for wolfs/coyotes/squirrels, etc., but when the spike showed up right outside of camp while the rest of us where out, it was the only gun my buddy's 17 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER who stayed back had close by. Her first moose BTW...). Very short range (60yards or so) well placed shot... made me feel a little "overgunned" with the cannon I was carrying around...

  8. #8
    Boolit Master
    Rick Hodges's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Taylor, Michigan
    Posts
    1,421
    I would opt for the .223. The 22 mag. is about a 125-150 yd. max rifle and if Coyote is on the agenda I wouldn't push it much past 50. The .223 is a truly great cartridge for varmints out to 300 yds. or so.

  9. #9
    Banned








    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    munising Michigan
    Posts
    17,725
    you probably handload if your on this fourm so id got 223. Its just as cheap to shoot handloaded 223s as it is to shoot 22 mags. Its much more powerful, flatter shooting and probably going to be more accurate.

  10. #10
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,207
    I have lost any and all interst in the .22 magnum. The cost of the ammo vs. the cost of reloading is far and beyond in favor of reloading anything center fire. I even sold my Marlin in .22 mag since it just set around collecting dust. I would favor the .223 for all the reasons stated above, but you may fall in love with one of the other .22 CF's out there. There are still cult followers of the Hornet and that one refuses to die. I want to say I just read something about a new .17 Hornet but that's for another thread.

  11. #11
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    1,795
    Quote Originally Posted by Bret4207 View Post
    You can reload the CF 22's for less than the 22 Mag will cost you.

    Agree! And you can shoot cast boolits in the center fires!

    Larry

  12. #12
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NE Ilinois
    Posts
    1,938
    I am doing well shooting a .22-250 with cast bullets---I use a RCBS 55 SP-GC with 8.0 grains of Unque to get 1,870 FPS MV... at higher velocities the accuracy falls off. At 225 yards I have no trouble hitting am index card sized target...if the wind is not too strong. I have not done as well using the .223 Rem...but I keep trying.

    As I make my own Gas Checks this is an economical load that is quite a bit cheaper than factory .22 RF Mags or the .17 HMR.

  13. #13
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    central arkansas
    Posts
    1,363
    .223 all the way, i love my .22 mag, and everything that i've shot with it has parished. but with the 223 you can get more range, and like has been said it's cheaper to shoot. call me crazy, but under a 125yds. i'd rather have my 22 mag.

  14. #14
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Gorham Maine
    Posts
    499
    223, if you want 22 mag level performance you can get that from the 223. If you want fullpower you can get that as well. You can't get 223 performance out of a 22 mag.

  15. #15
    Boolit Master badbob454's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    1,589
    +1 for the 223 you can load down the .223 to magnum speeds but not the reverse . and cheaper to boot when reloaded
    Last edited by badbob454; 10-05-2011 at 08:08 PM.

  16. #16
    Boolit Grand Master JIMinPHX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Moving back east now
    Posts
    5,089
    The .22 mag is a great little round for the recoil sensitive shooter that doesn't reload & want's to hunt small game, up to Coyotes & Javalina at modest ranges.

    Being a reloader & especially being a caster, I find no need for that caliber in my gun cabinet. A downloaded .223 will match anything that a .22mag will do & cost less to shoot in the process. The .223 gives great versatility to the hand loader up to medium game at medium ranges when loaded warm & down to rabbits or other small critters when loaded modestly.

    Even at today's high prices, .223 ball ammo is still fairly reasonably priced. Brass is plentiful. Loading data can be found just about anywhere that you look.

    .223 is a great caliber to have for a number of reasons, especially if you hand load.

    In other words - ditto what most everyone else said.
    “an armed society is a polite society.”
    Robert A. Heinlein

    "Idque apud imperitos humanitas vocabatur, cum pars servitutis esset."
    Publius Tacitus

  17. #17
    Boolit Master GabbyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    3,870
    I’ve come real close to ordering an ER Shaw MK VII in 6 x 45 (6mm x 223) with 1-12” twist 22” barrel. Just for shooting my 84 and 87 grain cast 6mm boolits.

  18. #18
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    central arkansas
    Posts
    1,363
    well where i hunt rimfire is all you can use for rabbits, squirrel and small critters. so 22mag is what i use.

  19. #19
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Gorham Maine
    Posts
    499
    Quote Originally Posted by GabbyM View Post
    I’ve come real close to ordering an ER Shaw MK VII in 6 x 45 (6mm x 223) with 1-12” twist 22” barrel. Just for shooting my 84 and 87 grain cast 6mm boolits.

    I have an ER Shaw barrel on my latest Savage build and it is a real shooter. I would buy another one if finances allowed.

  20. #20
    Boolit Grand Master


    swheeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    5,471
    I own both and can tell you the 223 gets shot a lot more than the 22 mag. Components to reload the 223 are cheap and available almost everywhere. Get the 223 and a bullet mold for it, no 10 dollar a box RF ammo to buy.
    Charter Member #148

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check