PBcastcoLee PrecisionInline FabricationRepackbox
RotoMetals2Reloading EverythingTitan ReloadingMidSouth Shooters Supply
Wideners Load Data
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Undersize Lyman Postells --- except for driving band

  1. #1
    Boolit Master mehavey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,513

    Undersize Lyman Postells --- except for driving band

    Brand new mold arrived today.

    Anyone else had this happen...?


    I could understand (though not like) all the bands being undersized, but just the forward ones?

  2. #2
    Banned


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    29˚68’27”N, 99˚12’07”W
    Posts
    14,662
    I have two of them, both made in the past few years, that cast about .4555" x .45655" with 20:1. Base band is small, too, though. Send it back to Lyman if it won't cast a round, .457" with 20:1 at least.

    Next time buy a different brand, preferably a custom maker who still cares about what alloy you use and what size you want your boolits. I highly recommend Accurate Molds, and since they don't do group buys they aren't years behind in production like most of the others.

    Gear

  3. #3
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    soda springs Id.
    Posts
    28,088
    well they are improving..
    1 outta 5 is a step up from normal.

  4. #4
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,289
    Before you "send it back" check the Lyman #3 or#4 cast bullet manuls and see what the alloy was that they based the nominal .457 on. I don't think itwas a 30-1 alloy.

    Also are you using the same castin technique with a dipper as shown i the Lyman manuals? Using a bottom pour, or just pouring into the mould can easily cause undersize bullets, especially with larger bullets such as yours.

    Larry Gibson

  5. #5
    Boolit Master mehavey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,513
    Casting technique has been/remains a full dipper held in tight contact w/ the sprue hole for a lazy three-count, then released slightly to put a liquid "dollup" on it to harden. ('Has been a dependable technique for sharp fill-out/clean bases since`68 when I figured out bottom-pour was always a frustrating [dice] shoot..)

    As originally noted, I could understand all bands being undersized, ...but different sizes like that? `Tis a puzzlement.

    I'll shoot it ahead of 75gr 1F tomorrow and see if there's a pony in that pile.

    Meanwhile, I've also got a Paul Jones 540 Creedmore on order.

    ...and can always shoot some more of Dave Jennings' superb Postells in the meantime.

    But still... `tis that puzzlement.

  6. #6
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SW Idaho
    Posts
    2,264
    now you know why most of the BPCR guys have gone to Jones or Brooks, and a few to Mr Gullo.

    Maybe this is Lyman's new bore riding groove design...?

    Rich
    Sua Sponte

  7. #7
    Boolit Grand Master In Remembrance
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    6,314
    ... and see what the alloy was that they based the nominal .457 on.
    My understanding is their CAD program calculations are based on Lyman #2 alloy
    Regards
    John

  8. #8
    Banned


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    29˚68’27”N, 99˚12’07”W
    Posts
    14,662
    Quote Originally Posted by John Boy View Post
    My understanding is their CAD program calculations are based on Lyman #2 alloy
    Lyman load data has been based on #2 and 20:1 both.

    Gear

  9. #9
    Banned

    44man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    22,705
    Pretty common with Lyman and RCBS. Hard to get the right size.

  10. #10
    Boolit Master mehavey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,513
    100 Yrd Results this evening:





    I dunno, guys.
    This is a tough call.


  11. #11
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,289
    Hmmmm.....459 and excellent accuracy when cast of 20-1, the alloy it was designed for........don't "send it back"...send it to me

    Larry Gibson

  12. #12
    Boolit Grand Master
    9.3X62AL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Redlands, NorKifornia
    Posts
    11,551
    Quote Originally Posted by Idaho Sharpshooter View Post
    Maybe this is Lyman's new bore riding groove design...?
    OUCH!

    Even at nominal .457" diameter, how many (more like, HOW FEW) 45 caliber rifle bores are well-served by a .457" casting? The three 45-70 rifles I've owned (2 Marlins and a Ruger #1) have/had throats mic'ed at .459"-.461". A beater Trapdoor now in the safe has grooves running .462".

    I "get it" that lead/tin alloys can "bump up" boolit diameters more readily than can smokeless fuels, but what's the point of relying on such gymnastics when a mould can be cut to fit well as easily as it can be cut undersized? THAT I don't get, at all.
    I don't paint bullets. I like Black Rifle Coffee. Sacred cows are always fair game. California is to the United States what Syria is to Russia and North Korea is to China/South Korea/Japan--a Hermit Kingdom detached from the real world and led by delusional maniacs, an economic and social basket case sustained by "foreign" aid so as to not lose military bases.

  13. #13
    Boolit Master mehavey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,513
    Hmmmm.....459 and excellent accuracy when cast of 20-1,
    the alloy it was designed for........don't "send it back"...
    send it to me
    Unfortunately (or fortunately) that was Dave Jennings' Lyman 457132/Postell from Montana Bullet Works
    -- not the offending Lyman mould that I received a few days ago.

    Somehow, I don't think going from 1:30 to 1:20 is going to solve a 4 thousandths difference between that one
    driving band and all four other bands. But...... I've gone ahead and ordered up some #2 from RotoMetals "...just to see."

  14. #14
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,289
    You might just try it anyway with 20-1. Also I might suggest not; "dipper held in tight contact w/ the sprue hole for a lazy three-count" but instead as soon as the cavity is full rotate back to sprue at top while the alloy is still molten and then "put a liquid "dollup" on it to harden." I hold the mould over the pot when doing such and let most of the full Lyan dipper of alloy flow into and over the sprue hole and plate.

    .457 is the nominal diameter for the Lyman mould anyway. So .002 shouldn't be hard to pick up....possibly more. If the mould doesn't work out I would really like to see that mould before you send it back to Lyman(?). I will pay the shipping.

    Larry Gibson

  15. #15
    Boolit Grand Master
    btroj's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Nebraska's oldest city
    Posts
    12,418
    Wow Larry, are you a customer service rep for Lyman?

    I would never buy a Lyman mould for 45-70 unless my rifle was of .457 bore or smaller. I can get a mould from other makers that will cast the size I need without playing games with technique, temp, alloy and stuff. I want a mould that works, first time, every time.

  16. #16
    In Remembrance
    montana_charlie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    West of Great Falls, Montana
    Posts
    8,414
    I don't remember where I read this, but it was from Lyman and it was a long time ago.

    The .457xxx designation means that a bullet cast from that mould, in Lyman #2 alloy, can be sized down to .457" without damage ... 'damage' defined as 'noticeably modifying the original design'.

    While .457" may be a minimum acceptable diameter on the small end of the Lyman tolerance range, the wording of the above indicates that a bullet larger than .457" is expected.

    CM
    Retired...TWICE. Now just raisin' cows and livin' on borrowed time.

  17. #17
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,289
    Quote Originally Posted by btroj View Post
    Wow Larry, are you a customer service rep for Lyman?

    I would never buy a Lyman mould for 45-70 unless my rifle was of .457 bore or smaller. I can get a mould from other makers that will cast the size I need without playing games with technique, temp, alloy and stuff. I want a mould that works, first time, every time.
    No I'm not. However, like a few I don't set out to bad mouth the companies that have made our hobby/sport/avocation possible. A mould is simply a product that is mass produced. I seen defects in all of them. Even a very recent GB mould was "defective" for cast oversized bullets. The maker made it good. Point is nothing manmade is perfect. I've had 2 other GB moulds that cast grossly oversized with the alloy I wanted to use but I do not blame the maker as that was not the alloy the moulds were designed around. There are + and - tolerences on anything produced. If any makers mould only casts to nominal diameter it should not be considered defective. If you want a bullet over the nominal diameter it is best to get one from a custom maker who can guarentee that oversize diameter.

    To "expect" a mould cast over sized is not a realistic expectation in my estimation. To criticise a mould because it does not cast to nominal when we don't use the right alloy the mould was designed for or because we don't cast correctly is also unrealistic in my estimation. I think we see to many moulds criticised (all makes) for the casters error.

    I've had numerous moulds sent to me that supposedly cast undersize. None did when I used the right alloy and casting technique including a recent Lyman 454190 from a prominant forum member. Yes, there are defective moulds shipped by all the makers. The more new moulds you buy the more likely you might get one. Most of them stand by their products. However, before criticising the mould for being oversize or undersize make sure YOU are casting correctly and are using the right alloy.

    Now, please, don't anyone get their feathers ruffled. I've made mistakes, I've not used the right aloy, I've even not cast correctly for the bullet/mould used and got poor bullets. Happens to all of us. If the mould is defective then so be it and I'm sure Lyman willmake it right. However, if it's not defective simply because it's not casting the size of bullet we want then lets not criticise the makers is all I'm saying.

    Larry Gibson

  18. #18
    Boolit Master Cap'n Morgan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    1,457
    I did several custom molds for 45 cal "money" type boolits. From what I've found, you should expect a shrinkage of approx 0.7% from a 20:1 alloy - a little more with less tin in the alloy.

    If you have the right measuring equipment - or know somebody who has, you can measure the mold and calculate the ideal dropping size from that specific mold:

    To find the bullet diameter from a known mold size, you just divide the cavity hole size with 1.007 (Notice the two zeroes)

    To find the mold size for a given boolit diameter, multiply the diameter with 1.007 That is, for a mold to cast a .459 boolit, the cavity should measure .459x1.007=.462
    Cap'n Morgan

  19. #19
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    68
    Have you tried casting at a hotter temp? Just a thought.--Mike.

  20. #20
    Boolit Grand Master In Remembrance
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    6,314
    mehavey, here is the Lyman Postell, 459, cast as is with clip on WW's (Bhn15.4) and 1/2% SN shot with BP that you might want to try...

    100yds - 25 shots - 14 in the ragged hole -

    Regards
    John

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check