Any feeding concerns between the bore ride diameter and the top bad diameter? I know some marlins wont feed the keiths in the 44 and 45Colt families, not sure about the 45-70's.
Any feeding concerns between the bore ride diameter and the top bad diameter? I know some marlins wont feed the keiths in the 44 and 45Colt families, not sure about the 45-70's.
Phaessler-
Here is the current large meplate boolit im using with no feeding issues, i expect design choosen to act the same:
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...0dccf9788f.jpg
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
I shoot similar profiles, in Marlin levers, 357/44/and 45-70, I just want ask about the "keith-type" shoulder before I sign up.
Attachment 213828
This is what I was referring to.
Thanks for the info
Thank you, big meplats are the ticket for me :bigsmyl2:
Attachment 213829
Two on the left are from an old BRP design, the third is one I had accurate cut my design, and the last on the right is an early Lee group buy.
If this design is for a Marlin 1895, are you not going to have a crimp groove in this design?
Thanks Wasalmonslayer! I would gladly add a smooth-side boolit, frankly, i didnt think anyone would be coating with this large a caliber. I love being wrong [emoji16]
Im on the road for next several hours, but will add when i get to hotel.
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
The problem with crimping over the top groove is neck tension is the only thing holding the bullet from being set back in the mag tube. Unless the crimp is driven into the bullet ogive which then causes bullet deformation. The crimp groove only gives security to bullet set back. It would not change the performance for people loading for single shot rifles.
The far left is a 330gn BRP design, circa the forum around 2006 or so, BRP is long retired. It hits hard and feeds well in my 1895's.
The third is my own design I had Accurate cut for me, 46-400C , 400gn 85% meplat, hits very hard, and feeds ok with a stiff motion on my Marlins.
Pete