PDA

View Full Version : The Trail Of Tears Begins Here (prescription meds & mass shootings).



DougGuy
06-26-2015, 12:20 PM
I have a habit of waking up and many times the first conscious thought is often very insightful, or the solution to a problem I was working on, or some warning or cautionary thought, I dunno where it comes from but often times it's the right thing to do or the right decision is shown to me, but this morning I woke up with the thought that maybe we need to think about creating a list of drugs that may leave a person at high risk of violent behavior, and possibly restricting access to firearms by those who are taking them.

It seems that nobody goes off and shoots up a schoolyard or a town hall meeting or church that isn't taking or has recently taken some of the more powerful psychoactive drugs that we treat depression and anxiety with. Maybe it's time to show our lawmakers that they don't need to be a doctor or a researcher or a rocket scientist to see the writing on the wall, and if they REALLY are serious about reducing gun violence, then let's try this and see if it works.

The whole flap over the confederate flag is a kneejerk reaction brought on by a trend to grab some attention in the name of cleansing one's business or practices of racism. Like taking down the flag is going to miraculously end racism overnight. Repealing the second amendment will no more stop violence than declaring a war on drugs stopped people from using them. It's PLAIN AND SIMPLE, MORE LAWS AREN'T GOING TO WORK ANY BETTER THAN THE LAWS WE ALREADY HAVE ARE WORKING. Or not.

If certain meds aggravate people and cause them to experience violent thoughts or cause them to do irrational things that they wouldn't normally do if they weren't medicated, then we need to enact measures that will separate the patients that are prescribed these meds from gaining access to guns. This may prove to be a difficult and complex task, and many lawmakers would rather sweep the issue under the carpet and simply restrict access to guns by everyone, therefore punishing law abiding citizens along with felons, the mentally ill, when they really need to sit down and commit themselves and their resources to the root cause of these heinous episodes of bloodshed, and they need to start taking this monster apart one piece at a time.

The "Trail Of Tears" as I call it, has it's roots in the doctor's office where these meds are prescribed. This is where the trail begins. IF there was procedures that were mandatory similar to a background check of the household so that before someone began taking the meds they and the household they live in would be secured in the event this person decided to take a gun and go off on society, maybe this is where the key to ending or severely curtailing gun violence begins.

This post was my waking thought this morning.

http://www.naturalnews.com/039752_mass_shootings_psychiatric_drugs_antidepres sants.html


• Eric Harris age 17 (first on Zoloft then Luvox) and Dylan Klebold aged 18 (Columbine school shooting in Littleton, Colorado), killed 12 students and 1 teacher, and wounded 23 others, before killing themselves. Klebold's medical records have never been made available to the public.

• Jeff Weise, age 16, had been prescribed 60 mg/day of Prozac (three times the average starting dose for adults!) when he shot his grandfather, his grandfather's girlfriend and many fellow students at Red Lake, Minnesota. He then shot himself. 10 dead, 12 wounded.

• Cory Baadsgaard, age 16, Wahluke (Washington state) High School, was on Paxil (which caused him to have hallucinations) when he took a rifle to his high school and held 23 classmates hostage. He has no memory of the event.

• Chris Fetters, age 13, killed his favorite aunt while taking Prozac.

• Christopher Pittman, age 12, murdered both his grandparents while taking Zoloft.

• Mathew Miller, age 13, hung himself in his bedroom closet after taking Zoloft for 6 days.

• Kip Kinkel, age 15, (on Prozac and Ritalin) shot his parents while they slept then went to school and opened fire killing 2 classmates and injuring 22 shortly after beginning Prozac treatment.

• Luke Woodham, age 16 (Prozac) killed his mother and then killed two students, wounding six others.

• A boy in Pocatello, ID (Zoloft) in 1998 had a Zoloft-induced seizure that caused an armed stand off at his school.

• Michael Carneal (Ritalin), age 14, opened fire on students at a high school prayer meeting in West Paducah, Kentucky. Three teenagers were killed, five others were wounded..

• A young man in Huntsville, Alabama (Ritalin) went psychotic chopping up his parents with an ax and also killing one sibling and almost murdering another.

• Andrew Golden, age 11, (Ritalin) and Mitchell Johnson, aged 14, (Ritalin) shot 15 people, killing four students, one teacher, and wounding 10 others.

• TJ Solomon, age 15, (Ritalin) high school student in Conyers, Georgia opened fire on and wounded six of his class mates.

• Rod Mathews, age 14, (Ritalin) beat a classmate to death with a bat.

• James Wilson, age 19, (various psychiatric drugs) from Breenwood, South Carolina, took a .22 caliber revolver into an elementary school killing two young girls, and wounding seven other children and two teachers.

• Elizabeth Bush, age 13, (Paxil) was responsible for a school shooting in Pennsylvania

• Jason Hoffman (Effexor and Celexa) – school shooting in El Cajon, California

• Jarred Viktor, age 15, (Paxil), after five days on Paxil he stabbed his grandmother 61 times.

• Chris Shanahan, age 15 (Paxil) in Rigby, ID who out of the blue killed a woman.

• Jeff Franklin (Prozac and Ritalin), Huntsville, AL, killed his parents as they came home from work using a sledge hammer, hatchet, butcher knife and mechanic's file, then attacked his younger brothers and sister.

• Neal Furrow (Prozac) in LA Jewish school shooting reported to have been court-ordered to be on Prozac along with several other medications.

• Kevin Rider, age 14, was withdrawing from Prozac when he died from a gunshot wound to his head. Initially it was ruled a suicide, but two years later, the investigation into his death was opened as a possible homicide. The prime suspect, also age 14, had been taking Zoloft and other SSRI antidepressants.

• Alex Kim, age 13, hung himself shortly after his Lexapro prescription had been doubled.

• Diane Routhier was prescribed Welbutrin for gallstone problems. Six days later, after suffering many adverse effects of the drug, she shot herself.

• Billy Willkomm, an accomplished wrestler and a University of Florida student, was prescribed Prozac at the age of 17. His family found him dead of suicide – hanging from a tall ladder at the family's Gulf Shore Boulevard home in July 2002.

• Kara Jaye Anne Fuller-Otter, age 12, was on Paxil when she hung herself from a hook in her closet. Kara's parents said ".... the damn doctor wouldn't take her off it and I asked him to when we went in on the second visit. I told him I thought she was having some sort of reaction to Paxil...")

• Gareth Christian, Vancouver, age 18, was on Paxil when he committed suicide in 2002, (Gareth's father could not accept his son's death and killed himself.)

• Julie Woodward, age 17, was on Zoloft when she hung herself in her family's detached garage.

• Matthew Miller was 13 when he saw a psychiatrist because he was having difficulty at school. The psychiatrist gave him samples of Zoloft. Seven days later his mother found him dead, hanging by a belt from a laundry hook in his closet.

• Kurt Danysh, age 18, and on Prozac, killed his father with a shotgun. He is now behind prison bars, and writes letters, trying to warn the world that SSRI drugs can kill.

• Woody __, age 37, committed suicide while in his 5th week of taking Zoloft. Shortly before his death his physician suggested doubling the dose of the drug. He had seen his physician only for insomnia. He had never been depressed, nor did he have any history of any mental illness symptoms.

• A boy from Houston, age 10, shot and killed his father after his Prozac dosage was increased.

• Hammad Memon, age 15, shot and killed a fellow middle school student. He had been diagnosed with ADHD and depression and was taking Zoloft and "other drugs for the conditions."

• Matti Saari, a 22-year-old culinary student, shot and killed 9 students and a teacher, and wounded another student, before killing himself. Saari was taking an SSRI and a benzodiazapine.

• Steven Kazmierczak, age 27, shot and killed five people and wounded 21 others before killing himself in a Northern Illinois University auditorium. According to his girlfriend, he had recently been taking Prozac, Xanax and Ambien. Toxicology results showed that he still had trace amounts of Xanax in his system.

• Finnish gunman Pekka-Eric Auvinen, age 18, had been taking antidepressants before he killed eight people and wounded a dozen more at Jokela High School – then he committed suicide.

• Asa Coon from Cleveland, age 14, shot and wounded four before taking his own life. Court records show Coon was on Trazodone.

• Jon Romano, age 16, on medication for depression, fired a shotgun at a teacher in his New York high school.

Missing from list... 3 of 4 known to have taken these same meds....

• What drugs was Jared Lee Loughner on, age 21...... killed 6 people and injuring 14 others in Tuscon, Az?

• What drugs was James Eagan Holmes on, age 24..... killed 12 people and injuring 59 others in Aurora Colorado?

• What drugs was Jacob Tyler Roberts on, age 22, killed 2 injured 1, Clackamas Or?

• What drugs was Adam Peter Lanza on, age 20, Killed 26 and wounded 2 in Newtown Ct?

Those focusing on further firearms bans or magazine restrictions are clearly focusing on the wrong issue and asking the wrong questions, either as a deliberate attempt to hide these links, or out of complete and utter ignorance.

Don't let them! Force our elected "representatives" and the media to cast a harsh spotlight on this issue. Don't stop hounding them until they do.

Thumbcocker
06-26-2015, 12:35 PM
It could be that the meds are an attempt to treat seriously I'll people with a band aid instead of a tourniquet. Insurance loves cheap pills instead of expensive phycotherapy. Therapy takes longer and costs more but can treat depression better.

white eagle
06-26-2015, 12:48 PM
Might be being already at the tipping point the meds only serve to push them over the edge

Wis. Tom
06-26-2015, 02:05 PM
Follow the money. Big Phama spend huge money, buying our politicians, and neither care who dies, as greed and power is a very powerful drug in itself. Guns are the scapegoat, and also the only thing left standing, from the govt. complete takeover, of the United States. A medicated public is the perfect antidote to fog over the real problems, and to coverup who is really to blame, for all this mess.

opos
06-26-2015, 02:21 PM
I had some personal experience with a doctor "medicating" to try and head off a "potential" situation.

I was injured in Mexico some years ago and the phrenic nerve that operates 1/2 of my diaphragm is no longer functional...hence I have only one working lung. During the period right after the injury I was seeing a neurologist that was verifying the damage and the possibility of treatment...when she found what the situation was she informed me that I'd not have the use of the lung but it was something that many people have had happen (called blunt force trauma...sort of like hitting a steering wheel in a car wreck). She said there was one thing that I needed to do and that was to begin to take a drug called Paxil.

Paxil is an anti depressent and pretty powerful as I understand...I've never had a depressed (truly depressed) period in my life....so I asked why..she said that a person that loses a major nerve like this is often beset with neurological depression as a result...I had nothing to draw on so went ahead and began to take the medication.

Within less than a week I was having serious side effects...and the major problem was I was getting extremely angry and agitated at the slightest thing...My Wife who knows my moods was very concerned and we went back to the doctor...when she heard what was going on she said...there are some people that can't tolerate Paxil and they can become a real danger to themselves and others and to stop taking the medication immediately...I'd not taken it long enough to require a tapering off.

The reason I bring this up is my case is a case of a doctor...highly thought of doctor...prescribing a powerful drug on the "chance" I might experience some problems..she did not monitor nor discuss any side effects and then after I really got to be a handful..she said "oh well that happens" and having me stop.

I wonder how many time bombs are walking around out there with a load of drugs in their system and a serious side effects problem just waiting to explode? Doctors have become pill pushers for the most part.."treat em and street em"...get the patient in and out as fast as possible.

I don't take any new medication without a second professional appraisal...I'm almost 78 and not a user of much medication and not going to be pushed aside with some pill without knowing what it is meant to do..what might occur and how it's to be monitored...burned once but never again.

buckwheatpaul
06-26-2015, 02:54 PM
Great thoughts and great research.....I have often felt that doctors were quick to medicate rather than to deal with the problem head on.

Handloader109
06-26-2015, 04:39 PM
Opos, I agree a 110 % with your reasoning. I've been very healthy and very minor medical issues my 56 years. I have an extremely bad gag reflex. No telling how many dental hygienists I have run off in my life.... At any rate, for the past few months I have been experiencing this gagging every day when I put on my tie, and more frequently every day. Finally went to MD this week, blood work is fine nothing is life threatening, most probably my tonsils. But MD still had me take a round of steroids "just to see if it help" and I'll get referred to a specialist. No diagnosis, just got to give out meds....

Elkins45
06-26-2015, 05:06 PM
It would be interesting to correlate that list with the amount of time spent playing first-person-shooter video games where the object is to kill as many people as you can.

JeffinNZ
06-26-2015, 09:18 PM
Might be being already at the tipping point the meds only serve to push them over the edge

Or maybe without them the list would be even longer.

I'm on Prozac. I have no compulsion to hold up a bank or shoot up a church. Maybe I just sane.

There is actually bigger question here. Why is it that other countries with higher per capita firearms ownership than the US (eg: New Zealand, Switzerland) don't have mass shootings (are at the very least nowhere near as many)? That's a serious question. It's not a criticism. It's not a "we're better than you". It's just a question.

Thumbcocker
06-26-2015, 09:21 PM
Homogeneous vs. heterogeneous societies. Common cultural values.

MaryB
06-26-2015, 11:12 PM
Better family structure, less divisiveness from government, less of the victim attitude... all factors... also different cultures that make it impossible to compare.

MaryB
06-26-2015, 11:15 PM
As you well know drugs affect everyone differently. When I first tore up my shoulders they tried giving me hydrocodone... stuff has zero affect on me. Even stronger narcotics barely work. I can take a dose of percocet that would put most in bed, barely dulls my pain. And I had just started taking them so it wasn't tolerance. My body responds poorly to most drugs so it has been a challenge to find what I can take when needed.


Or maybe without them the list would be even longer.

I'm on Prozac. I have no compulsion to hold up a bank or shoot up a church. Maybe I just sane.

There is actually bigger question here. Why is it that other countries with higher per capita firearms ownership than the US (eg: New Zealand, Switzerland) don't have mass shootings (are at the very least nowhere near as many)? That's a serious question. It's not a criticism. It's not a "we're better than you". It's just a question.

Wayne Smith
06-27-2015, 08:24 AM
As you well know drugs affect everyone differently. When I first tore up my shoulders they tried giving me hydrocodone... stuff has zero affect on me. Even stronger narcotics barely work. I can take a dose of percocet that would put most in bed, barely dulls my pain. And I had just started taking them so it wasn't tolerance. My body responds poorly to most drugs so it has been a challenge to find what I can take when needed.

On the other hand my dad, back in the early '60's had an emergency appendectomy. I feel sorry for the anestheologist to this day, Dad didn't wake up for two days! After that they started him on children's doses of everything.

Doug, correlation is not causation. All you are posting are correlations. That is a statistical error if you imply, as you do, causation. There is a very strong statistical correlation between the number of Churches in a city and the number of bars in the same city. Yes, .99 positive correlation. (correlations go from +1 to -1) Do bars cause Churches? Do Churches cause bars?

No (you can argue both, but prove neither!) increase in population causes the increase in both Churches and bars.

Somewhere I still have a book from my graduate studies How To Lie With Statistics. There are lots of errors commonly made. It is wise to try to avoid them when possible.

Hickory
06-27-2015, 08:50 AM
I noticed that most of the people in the OP were young, at puberty or post puberty when hormones really mess up a teens mind. The introduction of a psychotic drug on a person who is experiencing a normal & natural transition in live can (in my beliefs) upset the natural chemistry of puberty and send these kids on a killing spree.
But, who am I, a person a mile away looking at the forest, and the professional are on top of it, only seeing the trees.

Garyshome
06-27-2015, 09:02 AM
The problem with "OUR" lawmakers is that they are LAWYERS, And of course we all know that lawyers know what is best for us.

white eagle
06-27-2015, 09:28 AM
Why is it that this generation say the (90's+) are being doled out anti depressants so readilly
my son tells me that alot of his peers were on them.
Is it the pharmaceutical companies pushing these drugs to the doctors
Look at the tv commercials for some of these new wonder drugs and listen at the end of the possible
side effects
those alone should make you shutter
I believe its all greed,the bottom line

DougGuy
06-27-2015, 01:03 PM
I do think age has a lot to do with these violent episodes.

When I was young, I had a hateful relationship with my dad. We did not get along at all. I was adopted at 6mo and I didn't turn into the person he had already chosen me to become and all he saw was my failure to live up to that. He never saw me for the person I was becoming. There was a lot of anger and looking back on that period in my life, I might have been a high risk kid had I been medicated with some of the same meds they are putting kids on these days. I could see myself going off against my dad or my family. I had to grow out of that by getting out of that house at an early age. He waited until I had the engine out of my car and taken apart in the back yard and decided to lock me out of the house because I wouldn't get a haircut. I was 17 and I spent the night in the back seat in greasy coveralls. It was a LONG TIME before I ever went back to that house again.

In this case, my own life, I could see the breakdown in family values, and keeping the peace at home was WAY out of alignment. If my dad had taken me to doctors or even the cops back then I think it would have only gotten worse sooner. I don't think there was a "fix" for it because the root cause was not with me but with him. Had he even thought to realize that I was going to be my own person, and had even slightly acknowledged MY RIGHT to my own individuality, things would have been a LOT different. Things would have been MUCH BETTER for both of us and for that household. THANK GOD they didn't have these meds back then!

Correlation/causation, bleh.. Statistics can be used to show lots of things, but the list of meds and the shooters that were taking them are hard facts. These were all learned in hindsight which is of course always 20/20.

This whole thread was posted as a suggestion that it may be time to reclassify some of these prescription meds into a class all their own, which will restrict the access of the patient who takes them to any firearms or other dangerous weapons. Maybe after age 25 or 30 this restricted access to firearms might not be necessary. Maybe by that age people are mentally more stable than they are at 15 or 21 years of age and are not such a risk for violent behavior.

We have meds dispensed in prescription bottles with warnings clearly marked about operating a motor vehicle or machinery while taking the meds, maybe it's time to put a warning on the bottle with a firearm in a red circle with a slash through it. Maybe it's time to educate the parents of patients as to the need for securing the household in the event that their youngster may be at risk for a violent episode because of the medication.

This is a serious problem that the only thing that is certain about it, it isn't going to go away by itself. We need to do things that will aid in preventing these kind of episodes and the politicians restricting the 2nd amendment rights is not the answer. Solving the problem by starting at the root cause is the answer. Identifying who is likely to be at risk and putting two and two together should be the key to managing these kind of medications.

dtknowles
06-27-2015, 02:09 PM
Any medication that says you should not drive or operate machinery, the same warning means firearms or reloading or any other possibly dangerous activity.

Tim

SeabeeMan
06-27-2015, 06:50 PM
Those drugs can be pretty scary, especially when given to individuals who are still developing. They really do help sometimes, though. I know several people personally who have been able to get their life back together only with the help of some serious drugs.



Correlation/causation, bleh.. Statistics can be used to show lots of things, but the list of meds and the shooters that were taking them are hard facts. These were all learned in hindsight which is of course always 20/20.

In order to make any conclusions as to the correlation between psychoactive drugs and violence, there would also need to be numbers on those who commit violence of the specific type being discussed (or in general) who are not on/recently on those drugs, as well as those who are on psychoactive drugs and do not commit violent acts.

JeffinNZ
06-28-2015, 12:12 AM
You can blame drugs. You can blame guns. You can blame the government and/or law makers. The bottom line is this. While there is hatred and intolerance this will not stop happening. And be fooled by thinking that hatred and intolerance is only the domain of so called bad people. Plenty of 'good' people of full of both also.

MaryB
06-28-2015, 12:31 AM
Hatred and intolerance has been with us for thousands of years. I do not see it going away anytime soon!

TXGunNut
06-28-2015, 12:56 AM
Where there's smoke, there's generally fire. I know that these drugs have done lots of good for most patients but I think Doug has a good point, I've been thinking along these lines for years. I don't think we'll ever get the cooperation of the medical community on this issue, that's a scary thought in itself. I've been a victim of overmedication myself, they very scary experiences. Neither were psych drugs but I've learned to have a serious conversation with a doc before he/she prescribes anything for me. For example, I can't take hydrocodone anymore but Ibuprofen works fine for me.

Wayne Smith
06-28-2015, 07:17 AM
There is a logical fallacy operating here - akin to that applied to those abused as children and child abusers. Yes, most abusers were abused. No, the very great majority of those abused as children DO NOT go on to abuse others. If one, then all, is a logical fallacy.

There is also a complete ignorance of primary responsibility. We have known for at least 35 years (I was taught this in graduate school) that all the anti-depressants work to increase energy before they work to improve mood. I was taught to monitor suicidality when an antidepressant was prescribed for that reason. The fact that the SSRI and SNRI medications can also increase suicidal/violent thoughts only adds to that fact. The initial and inescapable responsibility goes not to the drug companies - these warnings have been in the literature for years - but to the doctors prescribing and the therapists following and the parents/loved ones interacting with those people.

Yes, I am one of those people and take that responsibility seriously.

Let me also repeat what I posted on the other thread. We cannot predict individual behavior on any level. You cannot even predict your own behavior in detail over the length of a day, I challenge anyone to try. If I cannot even predict my choices ahead of time I certainly can't predict someone else's behavior.

xs11jack
06-28-2015, 09:54 PM
While there is a lot of different causes of these problems, I go along with Wayne Smith(not because my name is Smith too) in that the doctors that proscribe these powerful meds and never have a thought about following up on the patients behavior are a big factor in the problems that arise from the meds. On the other hand, there are many, many people suffering from depression that are on proscribed meds that lead normal lives. Someone I read stated that about 80% of the population will experience a period of depression during their lifetime. If that is true, the statistics would condemn a couple of hundred million people in a population the size of the U.S., and they could possibly be unable to own firearms. Really scary thought, but just what the liberals would like to see happen.
Ole Jack

leeggen
06-28-2015, 11:41 PM
You try to take away my access to my guns, you better wake up your relation cause they ain't never seen such a fight. You are as bad as the ones taking down the con. flag cause 9 people were murderd. Just what would that do to all of the service people that take those drugs? Just because you are medicated with a certaqin drug in noway means you are going to murder someone. I know of people that I would like to kill but my upbringing won't let me and I'm not on drugs. You need to rethink your knee jerk thoughts!
CD

smokeywolf
06-29-2015, 12:09 AM
Wayne,

We have records of young people who were on psychotropics or anti-depressants and committed murders, but I've not seen statistics on patients with similar symptoms and conditions who were not put on the drugs but who still committed murder(s).
If you could take a group of young people all diagnosed with similar mental imbalances and follow the ones who were put on psychotropics or anti-depressants and those who were not, would that then offer more definitive proof that it was the drugs that were increasing or triggering the murderous/suicidal behavior?

DougGuy
06-29-2015, 12:45 AM
You need to rethink your knee jerk thoughts!
CD

Okay, let's hear YOUR suggestions on how to stop the violence and mass shootings..

If we don't try to deal with this monster, eventually we will ALL lose rights and freedoms that are constitutionally guaranteed because they will attack the 2nd amendment and with the mentality of the masses that elect our legislators, IGNORANCE will get voted into office and BOOM new laws, new restrictions, new attacks on gun owners and our rights.

pmer
06-29-2015, 01:00 AM
There is a logical fallacy operating here - akin to that applied to those abused as children and child abusers. Yes, most abusers were abused. No, the very great majority of those abused as children DO NOT go on to abuse others. If one, then all, is a logical fallacy.

There is also a complete ignorance of primary responsibility. We have known for at least 35 years (I was taught this in graduate school) that all the anti-depressants work to increase energy before they work to improve mood. I was taught to monitor suicidality when an antidepressant was prescribed for that reason. The fact that the SSRI and SNRI medications can also increase suicidal/violent thoughts only adds to that fact. The initial and inescapable responsibility goes not to the drug companies - these warnings have been in the literature for years - but to the doctors prescribing and the therapists following and the parents/loved ones interacting with those people.

Yes, I am one of those people and take that responsibility seriously.

Let me also repeat what I posted on the other thread. We cannot predict individual behavior on any level. You cannot even predict your own behavior in detail over the length of a day, I challenge anyone to try. If I cannot even predict my choices ahead of time I certainly can't predict someone else's behavior.

"Let me also repeat what I posted on the other thread. We cannot predict individual behavior on any level. You cannot even predict your own behavior in detail over the length of a day, I challenge anyone to try. If I cannot even predict my choices ahead of time I certainly can't predict someone else's behavior."

I'm sorry but I've heard sayings akin to this before like a mass transit person saying "you can't build your way out of traffic congestion" or PBO saying "we can't stop these mass shootings". I know there are more of these "we can't" or "you can't" sayings, I can't think of any more at the moment. Look at the Postal Service and McDonald's, they both have had murderous troubles that have seemed to stop. I don't think the thought process for most of a days activities is so overly complicated that you can't predict without at least some success. For Doug's, correlative list of murder to drugs I bet there are many more episodes of anger that go unreported.

JeffinNZ
06-29-2015, 04:31 AM
I also believe violent video games have a lot to answer for. They create a false sense of reality.

gray wolf
06-29-2015, 05:04 PM
[QUOTE] If that is true, the statistics would condemn a couple of hundred million people in a population the size of the U.S., and they could possibly be unable to own firearms. Really scary thought, but just what the liberals would like to see happen.
Ole Jack [/QUOTE

Bingo-- we have a winner.

Harter66
06-29-2015, 07:06 PM
Where do you draw the black and white legal line ?

I took Paxil for about 6 months when I was on it I was basically a warm body taking up space until a PHD put me through the screening process and my wife convinced me and the shrink that I was living under a ridiculous amount of stress which made it better ....or not. It took me almost 5 yrs to sort it all out and get to a place where I could solve 100% for the core stress source . The shrink would have steered me away I'm sure ....no offense to those in the profession. I was probably never a danger to myself or anyone else. However somewhere in between the meds and the source and getting me back I lost something, a part of me that is just gone .

I won't do that again . I am a very mechanical person and I took the time to polish every pin and cog until I found the loose bushing. Every once in a while I have to go back and and peen those bushings up to keep things running smoothly.

Back to the more immediate question, how do we keep emotionally comprised persons from doing horrible things .
take their guns away .......no.

Here's why because for every school and church shooter there are 10,000 that could have been shooters but didn't even on the meds. 2/3 of those repaired their lives or maybe even saved them. Yes I'm going to use it "you can't judge a million SSRI etc takers by the actions of 1 or 2 or 50".

Mortal Combat was a favorite of my kids and slasher movies ,there was even a run of 1st person shooters . They seem to be fairly normal well adjusted people and parents . It has more to do with family and family group support growing up than it does what games they played. Of course mine were introduced to the circle of life at a very young age . They knew eggs were baby chickens and the hamburger was that cute little calf 2 yrs ago.

Where would you draw the line ? That is the question that begs to be answered in every single debate of this nature . Do we draw it at the script for a particular med ? How about at any mood enhancing med ? How about seeing a PHD by court order or maybe by referral from an MD ,how about if you just made an appointment on your own ? Or maybe you just spilled you guts to the bar tinder ?
See this just becomes a big old box of snakes . I've known plenty of people that had really bad attitudes they were loud and mean and pushed in your face with wicked short tempers ,but it took about 10 seconds to back them down and shut them up. That doesn't make either party a risk ,it just makes 1 a jerk and 1 fed up.

I will repeat ,
you can't judge all by the actions of a few or 1.

TXGunNut
06-29-2015, 07:11 PM
It's not about the guns.

waynem34
06-29-2015, 10:34 PM
Follow the money. Big Phama spend huge money, buying our politicians, and neither care who dies, as greed and power is a very powerful drug in itself. Guns are the scapegoat, and also the only thing left standing, from the govt. complete takeover, of the United States. A medicated public is the perfect antidote to fog over the real problems, and to coverup who is really to blame, for all this mess.
I got thje hiccupps hiciccup but i agrreeeee

gray wolf
06-30-2015, 01:48 PM
It's not about the guns.

When guns enter the argument -- Then it's all about guns period.

Talking Meds without guns is a whole different ball game.

TXGunNut
06-30-2015, 03:00 PM
When guns enter the argument -- Then it's all about guns period.

Talking Meds without guns is a whole different ball game.

True enough, for some folks any issue involving guns evolves to being about guns. As responsible gun owners we need to be aware of that and try to avoid it.
Millions of people own guns, it seems millions of folks are taking these meds. Neither group concerns me, even when these groups overlap. What concerns me is that so many mass-murderers are taking these drugs. A few days after each story breaks folks begin to wonder which, not whether, Rx drug the killer was taking. Doug Guy's list included folks who didn't use guns to kill or commit suicide, that's why, to me anyway, it's not about the guns. The only common thread of all those incidents was psyche drugs. There's something going on here that needs to be studied and a knee-jerk reaction against guns or psyche drugs is not the answer.