PDA

View Full Version : Safe fillers in bottle neck cases?



andym79
07-09-2014, 03:08 AM
Hi guys can someone please let me know what fillers are safe in bottle neck cases?

Puff-lon?
Cream of wheat?
Sawdust?

(Is it true that organic solids all form hard plugs from time to time "bad in bottle neck cases").

Kapok?
Dacron?
Toilet paper?
Cotton wool?
BPI Original buffer?


I have not previously used any but am considering!

sthwestvictoria
07-09-2014, 04:21 AM
Hi guys can someone please let me know what fillers are safe in bottle neck cases?

more powder

andym79
07-09-2014, 04:35 AM
more powder

'More of a slower powder', but what if that's still not enough?

sthwestvictoria
07-09-2014, 05:13 AM
Yes that was a bit of a flippant answer however that is what I do. If I need so much powder to reduce position sensitivity that velocity is too high, then I swap powders to a faster, less position sensitive one. Or I use a harder bullet that will tolerate the velocity. Or come to realisation that some large volume cases are just not great for cast bullets.

Other people have a lot of success with inert fillers, dacron being most common. I don't know enough about it so avoid fillers. Larry Gibson has a very good sticky on the subject:
http://castboolits.gunloads.com/showthread.php?109280-The-proper-use-of-fillers

45 2.1
07-09-2014, 09:44 AM
What you want to know is entirely dependent on what you are doing. It does make a difference what you use with different load intensities with different weight boolits in different cartridges. One size doesn't fit all......................

runfiverun
07-09-2014, 01:15 PM
stay away from the cereals and organics, they do suck moisture out of the air and go hard.

there is a difference between a buffer and a filler too.
sometimes you need one or the other and sometimes you need/want both..

RobS
07-09-2014, 03:51 PM
I've used Dacron / polyester filler and it works well however I've only used dacron with extruded powders so I can't say as to other rifle powders with this filler.

andym79
07-10-2014, 05:40 AM
What you want to know is entirely dependent on what you are doing. It does make a difference what you use with different load intensities with different weight boolits in different cartridges. One size doesn't fit all......................

Could not agree more with what you are saying there 45 2.1.

The below are some loads I have used, some I plan on using and some hypothetical loads. What sort of filler would you deem to be suitable with these loads?

30-30 H4227(AR2207) 15 grains 170gn projectile
30-30 H4198(AR2207) 17 grains 170gn projectile


38-40 H4227(AR2205) 17 grains 175gn projectile


375W H4227(AR2205) 19 grains 250gn projectile
375W H4198(AR2207) 22 grains 250gn projectile


6.5X55 H4198(AR2207) 18 grains 140gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H4895(AR2206H) 23 grains 140gn GC projectile

6.5X55 H4895(AR2206H) 28 grains 132gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H4895(AR2206H) 29 grains 156gn GC projectile

6.5X55 H4350(AR2209) 33 grains 132gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H4350(AR2209) 35 grains 156gn GC projectile

6.5X55 H4831(AR2213) 36 grains 132gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H4831(AR2213) 37 grains 156gn GC projectile

6.5X55 H1000(AR2217) 42 grains 132gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H1000(AR2217) 42 grains 156gn GC projectile

Larry Gibson
07-10-2014, 11:44 AM
I most use and recommend the Dacron filler because it is easy to use, convenient and it most often works very well. I have extensively used the polly buffer fillers and find they work also but haven't had any work better than the Dacron filler. I suggest a reading of the sticky on filler use and my post #4 where I say why I use the filler, when I use the filler and how I use the filler. There are variances, especially when to use and when not to use.

Also let us not confuse the filler with the wad (I do not recommend the use of any material as a wad).

Larry Gibson

45 2.1
07-10-2014, 12:30 PM
Could not agree more with what you are saying there 45 2.1.

The below are some loads I have used, some I plan on using and some hypothetical loads. What sort of filler would you deem to be suitable with these loads?

30-30 H4227(AR2207) 15 grains 170gn projectile
30-30 H4198(AR2207) 17 grains 170gn projectile
I wouldn't use anything in the 30-30. You list two different powders with the same AR# also. The 30-30 gets Unique or SR4759 from me.


38-40 H4227(AR2205) 17 grains 175gn projectile
I wouldn't use anything in the 38-40, it's not necessary.


375W H4227(AR2205) 19 grains 250gn projectile
375W H4198(AR2207) 22 grains 250gn projectile
I use Rl 7 or 4198 in this cartridge with no filler due to small powder capacity.


6.5X55 H4198(AR2207) 18 grains 140gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H4895(AR2206H) 23 grains 140gn GC projectile

6.5X55 H4895(AR2206H) 28 grains 132gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H4895(AR2206H) 29 grains 156gn GC projectile

I use neither powder here.... and won't. I run the Swede at HV most of the time. My one concession is an 1,800 fps load with 2400 with no filler.

6.5X55 H4350(AR2209) 33 grains 132gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H4350(AR2209) 35 grains 156gn GC projectile

6.5X55 H4831(AR2213) 36 grains 132gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H4831(AR2213) 37 grains 156gn GC projectile

6.5X55 H1000(AR2217) 42 grains 132gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H1000(AR2217) 42 grains 156gn GC projectile
The three powders listed above could benefit from BP original buffer dependent on load density. My own use with this cartridge is a long out of production surplus 20mm powder with BP org. buffer.

Larry Gibson
07-10-2014, 12:43 PM
andym79

(I can appreciate the "m79" if it refers the M79)

Would you like a 2nd opinion to your question to 45 2.1?

Larry Gibson

45 2.1
07-10-2014, 12:55 PM
No questions were stated by me............. If you thought so, you were mistaken.

Scharfschuetze
07-10-2014, 01:15 PM
M79? Ha, ha! I can relate to that. Always like it much better than the M203.

I'm also a user of Dacron filler in some applications, particularly larger cases with slower powders in the IMR 3031 and 4895 class. I highly recommend Larry's aforementioned article for a well articulated answer to the OP's question.

I might add that when I tried COW filler, I started getting case separations at the web of 45/70 cases so I quit using it most ricky tick. I think that somehow the COW was sticking to the case walls and actually pulling the brass forward, even at cast boolit pressures. Dacron has never done that.

MBTcustom
07-10-2014, 01:29 PM
No questions were stated by me............. If you thought so, you were mistaken.

Funny, I thought Larry was offering an additional opinion to the OPs question.
You are correct. You asked no question.

45 2.1
07-10-2014, 01:44 PM
He probably did.... but the written word is an imperfect medium to express one's self most of the time.

Larry Gibson
07-10-2014, 01:51 PM
No questions were stated by me............. If you thought so, you were mistaken.

Shows how well you read what I post; note my post was addressed to andym79 and I said to him "Would you like a 2nd opinion to your question to 45 2.1". Nothing in that post addressed any question made or not by you.

The OP asked you a question, you answered it. I asked the OP if he wanted another answer to the question he asked you. Couldn't have been any plainer stated. No wonder you seem confused about matters, you fail to correctly read and comprehend. Perhaps the obvious? You would rather argue........

Larry Gibson

runfiverun
07-10-2014, 02:14 PM
really guy's...

andy:
I use the target to indicate if a filler is needed.
if I am getting some vertical stringing, I then add a filler.
if you do add a filler [Dacron] make sure it is lofted up and is seated on the powder, make sure it is compressed slightly by seating the boolit on top of it.
remember it makes the case think it is smaller and adding a filler will act like adding more powder.
don't pack/cram it in the case, and don't make a wad of it and shove it down on top of the powder.
about a 3/4" square [2 cm? shrug] is generally enough to fill a 308 or x57 case @ 50% or so.

waco
07-11-2014, 12:10 AM
I'll rent the hall, the ring, and the gloves. We could promote it here! Two men enter the square circle!

Sunday, Sunday, Sunday!!!!!!!!! One night only!!!!!! 45 2.1 VS. Larry Gibson!

You two need a sit down with the peace pipe brothers. :)

MBTcustom
07-11-2014, 07:27 AM
Better yet, I could start handing out infractions every time this happens.
Larry, that was unnecessary.

PAT303
07-11-2014, 07:51 AM
Could not agree more with what you are saying there 45 2.1.

The below are some loads I have used, some I plan on using and some hypothetical loads. What sort of filler would you deem to be suitable with these loads?

30-30 H4227(AR2207) 15 grains 170gn projectile
30-30 H4198(AR2207) 17 grains 170gn projectile


38-40 H4227(AR2205) 17 grains 175gn projectile


375W H4227(AR2205) 19 grains 250gn projectile
375W H4198(AR2207) 22 grains 250gn projectile


6.5X55 H4198(AR2207) 18 grains 140gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H4895(AR2206H) 23 grains 140gn GC projectile

6.5X55 H4895(AR2206H) 28 grains 132gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H4895(AR2206H) 29 grains 156gn GC projectile

6.5X55 H4350(AR2209) 33 grains 132gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H4350(AR2209) 35 grains 156gn GC projectile

6.5X55 H4831(AR2213) 36 grains 132gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H4831(AR2213) 37 grains 156gn GC projectile

6.5X55 H1000(AR2217) 42 grains 132gn GC projectile
6.5X55 H1000(AR2217) 42 grains 156gn GC projectile
42 grns of 2217 is too much,40 gives 2050fps,2213 should start at 35grn,none of those loads need filler,I've used them all. Pat

PAT303
07-11-2014, 07:54 AM
Shows how well you read what I post; note my post was addressed to andym79 and I said to him "Would you like a 2nd opinion to your question to 45 2.1". Nothing in that post addressed any question made or not by you.

The OP asked you a question, you answered it. I asked the OP if he wanted another answer to the question he asked you. Couldn't have been any plainer stated. No wonder you seem confused about matters, you fail to correctly read and comprehend. Perhaps the obvious? You would rather argue........

Larry Gibson
Can we have one thread without this childish BS please. Pat

PAT303
07-11-2014, 08:16 AM
I shoot 3P and field rifle so need accuracy over speed,I also don't want heat,my rifle shoots inside the xring at 50m with 10-11- 12grns of trail boss,inside the xring at 100 using 18-19-20grns of 2205 and not as good at 200 using 35grns of 2213.I have the original shot buffer and will use it to get my 200m groups smaller.Last weekend 40-41-42grns of 2217 gave no pressure but not much accuracy either,21-22-23grns of 2207 shot very well but didn't group any better than 2205 at 100,2206H shot excellent at 100,all loads used CBE 150grn or NOE 269145. Pat

andym79
07-11-2014, 09:10 AM
42 grns of 2217 is too much,40 gives 2050fps,2213 should start at 35grn,none of those loads need filler,I've used them all. Pat

Thats nice to know, I would rather try loads without a filler and consider adding it if the groups are bad!

The thought of anything else in the case makes me nervous. I know millions of rounds around the world must be fired with fillers each year, but to me it would be completely new.

On a slightly different note, with powders such as AR2209, AR2213 and AR2217, and fill % as low as (assuming slightly lower loads than those stated above being tested) 62%, 79% and 83% respectively; without filler am I possibly chasing a SEE or would that only be likely with jacketed projectiles?

andym79
07-11-2014, 09:13 AM
I shoot 3P and field rifle so need accuracy over speed,I also don't want heat,my rifle shoots inside the xring at 50m with 10-11- 12grns of trail boss,inside the xring at 100 using 18-19-20grns of 2205 and not as good at 200 using 35grns of 2213.I have the original shot buffer and will use it to get my 200m groups smaller.Last weekend 40-41-42grns of 2217 gave no pressure but not much accuracy either,21-22-23grns of 2207 shot very well but didn't group any better than 2205 at 100,2206H shot excellent at 100,all loads used CBE 150grn or NOE 269145. Pat

I find AR2205 to be one of the best powders for medium velocity and cast!

Whats was your AR2206H load (27 grains?) and did you use filler?

I feel more comfortable with this powder than slower ones!

jonp
07-11-2014, 09:18 AM
really guy's...

andy:
I use the target to indicate if a filler is needed.
if I am getting some vertical stringing, I then add a filler.
if you do add a filler [Dacron] make sure it is lofted up and is seated on the powder, make sure it is compressed slightly by seating the boolit on top of it.
remember it makes the case think it is smaller and adding a filler will act like adding more powder.
don't pack/cram it in the case, and don't make a wad of it and shove it down on top of the powder.
about a 3/4" square [2 cm? shrug] is generally enough to fill a 308 or x57 case @ 50% or so.

Why would lack of a filler cause vertical stringing?

btroj
07-11-2014, 09:38 AM
Position sensitivity. This leads to changes in pressure curve, barrel time, and velocity amongst other things.

some powders are far more sensitive to this than others.

PAT303
07-11-2014, 10:01 AM
Thats nice to know, I would rather try loads without a filler and consider adding it if the groups are bad!

The thought of anything else in the case makes me nervous. I know millions of rounds around the world must be fired with fillers each year, but to me it would be completely new.

On a slightly different note, with powders such as AR2209, AR2213 and AR2217, and fill % as low as (assuming slightly lower loads than those stated above being tested) 62%, 79% and 83% respectively; without filler am I possibly chasing a SEE or would that only be likely with jacketed projectiles?
I've fired thousands of these loads and never had an issue,I personally feel that our powder is not only temperature stable but is also not position sensitive,the best powder in the world. Pat

PAT303
07-11-2014, 10:06 AM
I find AR2205 to be one of the best powders for medium velocity and cast!

Whats was your AR2206H load (27 grains?) and did you use filler?

I feel more comfortable with this powder than slower ones!
Thats a good place to start,don't forget 2207,I've shot more of it than all the others combined but not in the 6.5,it's foolish to not use it and I will be working up loads with it,my next powder will be 8202.I've shot tens of thousands of 303's,it works with filler and 2207,again I've never had the clumping in the neck or drama's but the 6.5 is a different animal,get some original buffer from Shooters wholesale in Canberra. Pat

35remington
07-11-2014, 07:01 PM
Ahem. Yep, 303, it's position sensitive, even the made in Australia stuff. Tested specifically for it, and the velocity variation shows up, even in a little 25-20 case with Australian made IMR (really, it's H) 4227. H4895, etc. are position sensitive as well, with up to 200 fps variations, for instance, with cast bullet loads in a 7-30 Waters using ~130 grain cast bullets.

Bullshop
07-11-2014, 08:28 PM
One I did not see mentioned is Styrofoam packing popcorn and is what I use. In bottle neck cases I cut them with an exacto knife into pieces and insert enough to fill up to the case mouth so the seated boolit will compress it somewhat.
Its nearly weightless and wont change position or collapse in the case from rough handling of the ammo as when carried loose in a pocket on an all day walk about. Its also free which is very appealing to me. Free yes but not second rate in performance. My $.02

swheeler
07-11-2014, 08:29 PM
I've fired thousands of these loads and never had an issue,I personally feel that our powder is not only temperature stable but is also not position sensitive,the best powder in the world. Pat

Load 2213 down to 60% density without some sort of filler and tell me how that works out for you;( It's alright to be proud of your country and what they manufacture, but statements like this into the wrong hands can be dangerous. just saying

runfiverun
07-12-2014, 01:22 AM
well adi powders are hodgdons powders,,, just after a little boat ride is all.
same stuff different name.

swheeler
07-12-2014, 01:32 AM
well adi powders are hodgdons powders,,, just after a little boat ride is all.
same stuff different name.

I'll will rephrase for the yanks here:)

Load 2213 down to 60% density without some sort of filler and tell me how that works out for you;( It's alright to be proud of your country and what they manufacture, but statements like this into the wrong hands can be dangerous. just saying Aussie version

Load H4831 down to 60% density without some sort of filler and tell me how that works out for you;( It's alright to be proud of your country and what they manufacture, but statements like this into the wrong hands can be dangerous. just saying Yank version

PAT303
07-12-2014, 02:59 AM
Load 2213 down to 60% density without some sort of filler and tell me how that works out for you;( It's alright to be proud of your country and what they manufacture, but statements like this into the wrong hands can be dangerous. just saying



Already have mate,I've also done some testing,AR2213 is what I use,if people want to mix AR2213 up with what ever 4831 variant you guys have thats their problem. Pat

Stephen Cohen
07-12-2014, 05:22 AM
Well have to say I found AR 2207 position sensitive in my 458 wm, I was duplicating a 45/90 load and only half the powder actually burned and ended with a bullet stuck in barrel. Since it was a new can of powder and new shells I cant see what else it could have been.

PAT303
07-12-2014, 05:45 AM
Your having other problems there,load 2205 in the 32/20 or 310 cadet and you get half the powder not burning,thats nothing to do with what position it's in because the listed load fills the case. Pat

swheeler
07-12-2014, 10:24 AM
Already have mate,I've also done some testing,AR2213 is what I use,if people want to mix AR2213 up with what ever 4831 variant you guys have thats their problem. Pat

Pat as far as I know, or guess I should say thought I knew, ADI powder line is repackaged by Hodgdon under their numbers but same powder, could be wrong it's happened before.

brstevns
07-12-2014, 10:35 AM
Please! stop the fighting! We have lost enough good members because of misunderstandings.

swheeler
07-12-2014, 10:39 AM
What fighting??????????????????????

btroj
07-12-2014, 11:27 AM
Can we fight about whether or not we are fighting?

This isn't even close to a fight. This is a discussion about what Aussie made powders are available here and the differences in what we call them as opposed to what they call them.

swheeler
07-12-2014, 11:34 AM
Can we fight about whether or not we are fighting?

This isn't even close to a fight. This is a discussion about what Aussie made powders are available here and the differences in what we call them as opposed to what they call them.

Very good, I thought I had missed something in translation. It happens when you get "up there":)

runfiverun
07-12-2014, 12:18 PM
I know somewhere out there, there is a cross over sheet/chart from the adi 22 or whatever numbers to the H-3&4 numbers we use here.
it's confusing talking about the same thing with different numbers.
it's like having a Canadian blender on a frac crew, they measure [hectare] liters and we measure gallons/barrels the math never seems to come out , yet the job gets done somehow...

swheeler
07-12-2014, 12:23 PM
AS30N=Clays
AP50N = (No Hodgdon)
AS50N = International
AP70N = Universal
AP100 = (No Hodgdon)
AR2205 = H4227
AR2207 = H4198
AR2219 = H322
Bench Mark1 = (No Hodgdon)
Bench Mark2 = BenchMark
AR2206 = (No Hodgdon)
AR2206H = H4895
AR2208 = Varget
AR2209 = H4350
AR2213 = (Discontinued)
AR2213SC = H4831
AR2217 = H1000
AR2225 = Retumbo
AR2218 = H50BMG



Heres what I use

PAT303
07-12-2014, 09:14 PM
What fighting??????????????????????
Yeh what fighting??,don't you guys get surplus 4831 as well as ADI?,there would be pre ADI stuff around,wasn't it made in Scotland?. Pat

swheeler
07-12-2014, 09:40 PM
Yeh what fighting??,don't you guys get surplus 4831 as well as ADI?,there would be pre ADI stuff around,wasn't it made in Scotland?. Pat

Pat-Pat_Pat I haven't bought surplus 4831(sold by Hodgdon-manuf by Dupont) since the mid 1970's, IMR 4831 was introduced in 1971 and I refused to pay 3.50 per pound so still used surplus 4831. The last H4831 made in Scotland I bought was about 1995, the next year Hodgdon introduced their Extreme line with Varget(ADI) and a year later they switched to ADI manuf. Believe me I've tried plenty of the extreme line and they are POSITION SENSITIVE in reduced loadings, temp insensitivity(that too is debatable-but better than other single base extrudeds )are not same. I can assure you noone in their right mind will load their 300 win mag with 60% of max of H4831/2213 with out using a filler. We do see where it has been done(darwin/Youtube vids) but probably last time they will try that:) goodday mate;)

longbow
07-12-2014, 09:42 PM
Back to "safe fillers"...

I have been using COW for several years now and have no complaints. Originally, my intent was to use slower powders I had on hand but light charges with COW filler so I didn't wind up with a SEE or hangfire or...? using light loads. Reloading supplies are not generally readily available around here so I make do.

In any case, I wound up with several pounds of IMR4227 and have a few PB moulds. Well, my .303's were gas cutting fairly badly with anything more than light loads so I decided to try the COW filler over IMR4227. Accuracy picked up, leading and gas cutting stopped and I was happy!

I worked up loads with the filler and saw no signs of pressure issues, no signs of excessive brass stretching or anything else bad.

What's not to like? Cheap and easy, better accuracy. 100% loading density so no chance of double charges using light loads, no leading, better accuracy, higher velocities, and more I am sure.

As for the "COW filler absorbs moisture form the atmosphere", I loaded a bunch then took 5 and put them in an open Ziploc baggie and put it outside under a tree for 10 months ( I was aiming for a year but got impatient). They weren't directly exposed to snow and rain but certainly to humidity and temperature changes from about 94 F to -4 F over the year and whatever humidity Mother Nature provided.

I pulled the boolits to check and the COW was no different than the same cartridges stored in my basement loading room for the same length of time. They shot the same and no signs of caking, pressure or any other" bad" stuff.

I am sure that plastic shot buffer is as good or probably better but so far I have no complaints using COW.

It works for me.

Longbow

andym79
07-17-2014, 04:03 AM
I can assure you no one in their right mind will load their 300 win mag with 60% of max of H4831/2213 with out using a filler. We do see where it has been done(darwin/Youtube vids) but probably last time they will try that:) goodday mate;)

I can't seem to find the video, could you post the link?

andym79
07-17-2014, 04:07 AM
So with Dacron there is one big rule #1

NEVER EVER compress it heavily on the powder so that it leaves an air gap in the shoulder area before the bullet?

I guess from that best to leave it fluffed up in the neck and always store the round projectile up?

Larry Gibson
07-17-2014, 10:07 AM
andym79

So with Dacron there is one big rule #1

NEVER EVER compress it heavily on the powder so that it leaves an air gap in the shoulder area before the bullet?

That is correct.

I guess from that best to leave it fluffed up in the neck and always store the round projectile up?

If you've used enough Dacron so it is a fluffed up "filler" (filled the air space between the powder and base of the bullet) it can be stored and carried any way you want. The powder should not migrate.

Larry Gibson

RobS
07-18-2014, 05:56 PM
andym79

So with Dacron there is one big rule #1

NEVER EVER compress it heavily on the powder so that it leaves an air gap in the shoulder area before the bullet?

That is correct.

I guess from that best to leave it fluffed up in the neck and always store the round projectile up?

If you've used enough Dacron so it is a fluffed up "filler" (filled the air space between the powder and base of the bullet) it can be stored and carried any way you want. The powder should not migrate.

Larry Gibson

That's been my experience with the extruded powders I use.

303Guy
07-19-2014, 12:13 AM
I've fired thousands of these loads and never had an issue,I personally feel that our powder is not only temperature stable but is also not position sensitive,the best powder in the world. PatI tend to agree. That's why Hodgdon contracts so many of it's powder from ADI. I've found that H4350(AR2209) can go quite low in load density in my Brits but that is with heavier boolits. I like Dacron filler for a slightly different reason - it stops powder from spilling out into the action should a boolit get pulled out on extracting an unfired round. That because of the paper patched boolits being not too tight in the neck and fairly tight fit in the throat. There is a downside though and that is that if one doesn't notice, that boolit can stay there until another round is chambered and pushes the boolit into the case! But enough H4350 will stop that. Not so much with H4227.


Well, my .303's were gas cutting fairly badly with anything more than light loads so I decided to try the COW filler over IMR4227.Now that you mention it, I've tried corn grits over H4227 but I didn't range test them. I did fire them into my boolit trap. Two things happen, velocities (and pressure) goes up and muzzle blast goes down. Oh yes, the bore stays clean and the boolit bases get cupped and carry an amount of grits with them. They were plain based and rather soft alloy.

I was using Dacron even over fairy full loads to buffer the boolit base from powder peening and it worked. That and powder spilling. To that end I would compress the Dacron slightly. Not filling a 3/4 empty case mind you, only about 10% volume or less.

singleshot
07-19-2014, 12:44 AM
My experience mirrors Longbow's with both COW and used/dried coffee grounds. Now I use Dacron with the faster stuff (2 grains of Red Dot with Dacron under a 55 grain cast lead Bator works wonderfully in my 223 bolt-action, at least minute of bunny at 50 yards and in.) As mentioned, another benefit with COW is always having 100% load density and no chance of boolit setback.

303Guy
07-19-2014, 01:01 AM
I like wheat bran (sieved) or wheat germ but I tried wheat bran over small charges of clays under a light boolit. Shot great but there were signs of high pressure in the neck area (with no primer pressure signs) and channelling in the bran, leaving some behind in the case. I would also sometimes find rings of the stuff in the shoulder corner. Wheat germ doesn't do that. But wheat bran seemed to prevent gas cutting and bore leading and cleaned the bore quite well. I've never tried COW mostly because I don't know exactly what is is and can't find any on our shelves.

longbow
07-19-2014, 10:54 AM
I started out with cornmeal being as it was a carryover filler from my BP days but wasn't getting terrific accuracy. Whilst searching for answers I found David Southall's articles at http://www.303british.com/id37.html. I managed to get his e-mail address so contacted him and we had an interesting and educational exchange of info. At least I learned a lot.

David advised that he found COW to provide better accuracy than cornmeal where fillers were required/desirable and had some good powder suggestions as well. I gave it a try and sure enough things worked out better.

Now to qualify, I have worked loads up from quite light using the filler all the way by increasing powder charge and decreasing filler a I worked up. Pressure certainly increased but as long as it is predictable and within safe limits, who cares?

I have not worked up super hot loads by any means. Mostly my goal was typical cast boolit velocities for my .303 Lee Enfields with decent accuracy. I also found I could push PB boolits harder and still get good results. I have several PB .303 moulds and being lazy and cheap, don't like using gas checks unless I have to.

As for filler left in the cases after firing, I have as yet to find any. .303 British has a very small shoulder though so this may not be the case in other cartridges with steeper shoulders or larger body to neck.

One day I will get around to testing out shotgun buffer as filler for which we have several threads here and which I have found other reloading info on seemingly all positive as long as the filler is used appropriately and loads worked up with the filler.

FWIW

Longbow

303Guy
07-19-2014, 05:14 PM
.303 British has a very small shoulder though Some have a blown out chamber with a sharp neck/shoulder junction. It's one of these that left a ring of wheat bran. The other was channelling through the filler. It could have been a result of bugs spinning silk in the bran - these were cartridges that had been stored for a while. Either way, I do not recommend wheat bran for filling large spaces. I think I'll try COW if I can find some (or make some). On the COW absorbing moisture from the air - the loaded cartridge should be sealed I would think.

andym79
07-19-2014, 06:00 PM
I shoot 3P and field rifle so need accuracy over speed,I also don't want heat,my rifle shoots inside the xring at 50m with 10-11- 12grns of trail boss,inside the xring at 100 using 18-19-20grns of 2205 and not as good at 200 using 35grns of 2213.I have the original shot buffer and will use it to get my 200m groups smaller.Last weekend 40-41-42grns of 2217 gave no pressure but not much accuracy either,21-22-23grns of 2207 shot very well but didn't group any better than 2205 at 100,2206H shot excellent at 100,all loads used CBE 150grn or NOE 269145. Pat

Have you done any shooting with AR2208 (Varget) in the 6.5x55? Say between 26-29 grains?

longbow
07-19-2014, 07:48 PM
Cream 'O Wheat is made from wheat semolina. Similar to grits but finer and quite a bit finer than cornmeal which may be why it works better ~ better gas seal.

From my experience and testing there is no issue or at least no significant issue of moisture being absorbed from the air. After all there is neck tension and lube grooves full of grease to seal. The loaded cartridges I left outside for 10 months performed just the same as those left in the basement and there were no pressure signs from either even though when I pulled boolits from some the COW was somewhat compressed and hard ~ same for cartridges from outside and left in the basement (and no my basement is not a deep, dark, damp, dungeon).

Not sure I would use cereal filler for cartridges like 7mm Mag. or .264 Win. which are both large volume cartridges with steep, sharp shoulders and small neck/bore. However, so far with .303 British, no problems.

Longbow

barrabruce
07-22-2014, 12:32 PM
I can say that using Dacron in MY 30-30 has helped keep groups tighter for me.
Haven't tried the 2205 but used 2207 quite a bit with a tuft or Dacron.
I too Paper patch and althou I'm using up a few tins of 2206 27 grns seems about right for me I use a tuft to fill the neck.
Mainly for if I debullet a round I don't get powder in everything.
I'm using a grease cookie under my bullet to try and it stops lube migrating into the powder.

I use Dacron for light loads of 2.5-4 gns bulleye in the 30-30 as it shoots better for me.
I feather it out and its just a fluff seated on the powder up to the top of the case neck.
Then seat bullet.I had no ill effects doing this at all as far as I can tell.

Want you don't want to do is cram a case full Dacron sheeting.
Other cases I have no experience with.

Hope it helps
Barra

303Guy
07-24-2014, 04:39 AM
Thanks, longbow. I shall look into trying some.

Have you tried 2209 in your 30-30, barra? They say a slightly compressed load works well with cast (should work with PP too).