joshf
02-25-2012, 09:40 AM
Im sorry if these seem questions seem dumb but the threads I searched up did not really clear things up for me.
Ok I have a #1 enfield that has been sporterized almost beyond recognition. I thought it would be a cheap toy but it actually really grew on me so I want to cast for it.
My first attempts will be with Lee's c312-155-2r. I used 2 of the lee ingots made of wheel weights and added 45 inches of lead free solder. Which according to the manufacturer is 95% tin - 5% antimony.
1. I water dropped these and tested for hardness with my Lee hardness tester. I got an impression of about .040 which should be around 33 bhn.
This doesn't seem possible for WW with some solder added. Am I doing something wrong?
2. I drove one of these through the barrel to measure bore diameter. The largest part measures .309 which seems very small for a 100 year old rifle. All of my reloading manuals list it at .311 or larger. Also the slug was significantly tighter at the muzzle. It was loose and moved much more easily as it got towards the receiver.
Did I do this wrong?
3. Provided I didn't screw up either of the preceding does anyone have a recommendation for loading this bullet with either winchester 748 or imr 4064?
Sorry for the long winded questions and thank you in advance for any suggestions.
Ok I have a #1 enfield that has been sporterized almost beyond recognition. I thought it would be a cheap toy but it actually really grew on me so I want to cast for it.
My first attempts will be with Lee's c312-155-2r. I used 2 of the lee ingots made of wheel weights and added 45 inches of lead free solder. Which according to the manufacturer is 95% tin - 5% antimony.
1. I water dropped these and tested for hardness with my Lee hardness tester. I got an impression of about .040 which should be around 33 bhn.
This doesn't seem possible for WW with some solder added. Am I doing something wrong?
2. I drove one of these through the barrel to measure bore diameter. The largest part measures .309 which seems very small for a 100 year old rifle. All of my reloading manuals list it at .311 or larger. Also the slug was significantly tighter at the muzzle. It was loose and moved much more easily as it got towards the receiver.
Did I do this wrong?
3. Provided I didn't screw up either of the preceding does anyone have a recommendation for loading this bullet with either winchester 748 or imr 4064?
Sorry for the long winded questions and thank you in advance for any suggestions.