PDA

View Full Version : Sunday Telegraph Article


robertbank
03-17-2007, 04:57 PM
Sunday Telegraph Article

From today's UK wires:

Salute to a brave and modest nation - Kevin Myers,

The Sunday Telegraph LONDON

Until the deaths of Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan, probably almost no one outside their home country had been aware that Canadian troops are deployed in the region. And as always, Canada will bury its dead, just as the rest of the world, as always will forget its sacrifice, just as it always forgets nearly everything Canada ever does.

It seems that Canada's historic mission is to come to the selfless aid both of its friends and of complete strangers, and then, once the crisis is over, to be well and truly ignored. Canada is the perpetual wallflower that stands on the edge of the hall, waiting for someone to come and ask her for a dance. A fire breaks out, she risks life and limb to rescue her fellow dance-goers, and suffers serious injuries.
But when the hall is repaired and the dancing resumes, there is Canada, the wallflower still, while those she once helped glamorously cavort across the floor, blithely neglecting her yet again.

That is the price Canada pays for sharing the North American continent with the United States, and for being a selfless friend of Britain in two global conflicts. For much of the 20th century, Canada was torn in two different directions: It seemed to be a part of the old world, yet
had an address in the new one, and that divided identity ensured that it never fully got the gratitude it deserved.

Yet its purely voluntary contribution to the cause of freedom in two world wars was perhaps the greatest of any democracy. Almost 10% of Canada's entire population of seven million people served in the armed forces during the First World War, and nearly 60,000 died. The great Allied victories of 1918 were spearheaded by Canadian troops,
perhaps the most capable soldiers in the entire British order of battle.

Canada was repaid for its enormous sacrifice by downright neglect, its unique contribution to victory being absorbed into the popular Memory as somehow or other the work of the "British." The Second World War provided a re-run. The Canadian navy began the war with a half dozen vessels, and ended up policing nearly half of the Atlantic against
U-boat attack. More than 120 Canadian warships participated in the Normandy landings, during which 15,000 Canadian soldiers went ashore on D-Day alone. Canada finished the war with the third-largest navy and the fourth-largest air force in the world.

The world thanked Canada with the same sublime indifference as it had the previous time. Canadian participation in the war was acknowledged in film only if it was necessary to give an American actor a part in a
campaign in which the United States had clearly not participated - a touching scrupulousness which, of course, Hollywood has since abandoned, as it has any notion of a separate Canadian identity.

So it is a general rule that actors and filmmakers arriving in
Hollywood keep their nationality - unless, that is, they are Canadian. Thus Mary Pickford, Walter Huston, Donald Sutherland, Michael J. Fox, William Shatner, Norman Jewison, David Cronenberg, Alex Trebek, Art Linkletter and Dan Aykroyd have in the popular perception become
American, and Christopher Plummer, British. It is as if, in the very act of becoming famous, a Canadian ceases to be Canadian, unless she is Margaret Atwood, who is as unshakably Canadian as a moose, or Celine Dion, for whom Canada has proved quite unable to find any takers.

Moreover, Canada is every bit as querulously alert to the achievements of its sons and daughters as the rest of the world is completely unaware of them. The Canadians proudly say of themselves - and are unheard by anyone else - that 1% of the world's population has provided
10% of the world's peacekeeping forces. Canadian soldiers in the past half century have been the greatest peacekeepers on Earth - in 39 missions on UN mandates, and six on non-UN peacekeeping duties, from Vietnam to East Timor, from Sinai to Bosnia.

Yet the only foreign engagement that has entered the popular on-Canadiann imagination was the sorry affair in Somalia, in which out-of-control paratroopers murdered two Somali infiltrators. Their regiment was then disbanded in disgrace - a uniquely Canadian act of self-abasement for which, naturally, the Canadians received no international credit.

So who today in the United States knows about the stoic and selfless friendship its northern neighbour has given it in Afghanistan? Rather like Cyrano de Bergerac, Canada repeatedly does honourable things for honourable motives, but instead of being thanked for it, it remains something of a figure of fun.

It is the Canadian way, for which Canadians should be proud, yet such honour comes at a high cost. This past year more grieving Canadian families knew that cost all too tragically well.

Bullshop
03-17-2007, 07:55 PM
Thank you Canada! There is a reward for silent selfless sacrifice! P. G.
BIC/BS

MT Gianni
03-17-2007, 08:28 PM
Great article and Thank You Canada. Gianni

Buckshot
03-18-2007, 06:47 AM
............Hey, they left out John Garand!

............Buckshot

NVcurmudgeon
03-18-2007, 09:32 AM
Robert, some of us pay attention to news of Canadian contributions to the war on terror, no matter how hard it is to find, and are grateful. The war will go a lot better when all of Western civilization realizes that we are all in this together, and does something about it. Canada was a Godsend to Americans, from making instant Canadians of Americans trapped in Tehran in 1979, through today's service in Afghanistan. As has been the case for nearly 100 years, Canada has been a reliable and effective ally. Canada doesn't seem to care a lot about publicity, but quietly gets on with the job. Heartfelt thanks from south of the border.

dnepr
03-18-2007, 10:42 AM
It is good to hear our soldiers get the praise they deserve . I personally find it most disturbing when our soldiers get badmouthed or even assaulted by other Canadians. we have to show respect to our soldiers first before we can expect the rest of the world to do the same. Some people like down play our military contributions because we are such a " peaceful" country. My own personal truth is that I only get to enjoy my peaceful Canadian lifestyle , because the brave Canadian men and women of our armed forces stand at the ready to protect said lifestyle.

n
03-18-2007, 12:31 PM
Things go better before the politicians get involved. I "worked" with soldiers from Canada in Viet Nam. Also from Australia and a few other smaller countries. These people were every bit as well trained and capeable as those they served with. I have the deepest respect for Canada. I often have to travel to Canada for my employer and I have most of the time been treated well by the Canadians. If Canada's help and sacrafices have been lost in time I am truely sorry. You are a good people and you are a proud people as you deserve to be.
"Let Freedom Ring"
Nighthunter

walltube
03-18-2007, 01:12 PM
http://www.sbpg.net/jan2407.html

We sure as Hell have not forgotten!! GOD Bless the Canadians that came to our family and friends rescue weeks before any Federal or State "help" arrived. Just as soon as I am able, there WILL be a Maple Leaf at full mast in this old man's front yard.

Regards from The Diaspora St. Bernardians,

Walltube & Family

9.3X62AL
03-18-2007, 09:49 PM
Canada is likely the best friend the United States has ever had or will ever have. I am very well aware of the service and sacrifice of your nation's armed forces in Afghanistan currently and other locales previously. The news media has no clue what the terms "service" and "sacrifice" mean in any genuine sense of the words, and never will. The purchase of journalists for their true net worth and subsequent sale at their own perceived value would yield obscene profit.

And good neighbors? Contrast our northern neighbor to our southern neighbor, need I say more? Our government is a damn sight more concerned about Canadian beef getting in than about Mexican marijuana and heroin, judging by the absence of the former and surplus of the latter. Yeah, that makes sense.

wills
03-18-2007, 10:23 PM
Domestic marijuana and heroin producers probably do not have an effective lobby.

NVcurmudgeon
03-18-2007, 11:00 PM
Domestic marijuana and heroin producers probably do not have an effective lobby.

Wills, that was a laugh out loud for a full minute one-liner.

Nrut
03-18-2007, 11:59 PM
Wills, that was a laugh out loud for a full minute one-liner.

+1......:-D

Buckshot
03-19-2007, 02:16 AM
..............I think Canada just goes and does it and when it's over (whatever 'IT' is) they're more then happy to just get back to living their lives. I recently read a very good book on WW1. There were several battles in which the Canadians went over the top first as it was remarked that "If this offensive is to have any chance, the Canadians will have to lead".

There was another I'd read many years ago about the Normandy landings. A Canadian group was supposed to have captured this certain point by the end of the day. They did that fighting ferociously to do it, and they did it so quickly they ran off leaving their support behind. I suppose they felt if they could do it, the REMF's could too :-) In any event they were in a bit of a sticky wicket that night but were able to complete a successful retrograde action the next day to rejoin the rest of the unit. At least they knew the way pretty well :-)

...............Buckshot