Maven
07-11-2011, 08:09 PM
Made some definite progress with the trade gun today by eliminating a few variables, namely one of the RB's I was using and the powder charge. "Backstory": The bore of my trade gun measures .615" and thus I ordered a .600" RB mould (sic) from Jeff Tanner last year. Meanwhile, a friend gave me a .600" Dixie mold too. However, I also couldn't resist bidding on a new Rapine .600" RB, which I won. I quickly learned that the Tanner RB @ .597" and the Dixie @ .600" with patches of a given thickness (more on this below) outshot the Rapine RB @ 610" by a large margin.
Today, I retested the Rapine and Tanner RB's using the same patching and powder charge for each, and confirmed what I suspected: My gun likes the Tanner RB much better than the Rapine, which doesn't group very well at all. Although I didn't test it today, past experience with the Dixie has also been gratifiying. All testing has been @ 25yd. using FFg, both Graf's/Wano and Diamondback (today). Patches were red striped pillow ticking, which mic's ~.001" less than the blue striped version by the same manufacturer and is .013" compressed. This makes starting and seating the RB a pleasure. No blown patches with the .013" ticking either. Lube was Winchester Sutler's "Moose Milk" (soaked the patches in it and kept them fairly wet). However, "Friendship Speed Juice" (equal parts Murphy's Oil Soap, isopropyl alcohol, and 3% hydrogen peroxide) works just as well if not better. Btw, I don't wipe the bore at all when using either lube in the trade gun.
So what did I learn today? (1) That my gun does better with .597" - .600" RB's. (2) That patch thickness is more a question of ease of loading than accuracy. I.e., .013" - .016" compressed pillow tick patches work equally well, but much more effort is needed to load those as thick as .020". (3) That powder charge isn't so critical @ 25yd. as I thought. Today I used 70gr. Diamondback FFg and got the same results as I did with 85gr. of the same powder & Graf's. Moreover, the results with 70gr. Graf's FFFg were about the same, albeit with more recoil. (4) That it's better not to introduce too many variables (ball diameters, patch thicknesses) at a time when testing. (5) That I now need to sell the Rapine mold!
Just for laughs, and practice too since the NMLRA July postal match target is due by the 31st, I tried offhand shooting at a copy of that target (diameter of 8, 9 & 10 rings [black] is 2 3/4"). Once I settled down, I was able to keep 3 in the 8 & 9 rings, but my own wobbliness and flint issues combined to put the other 5 elsewhere. However, 3 of those others grouped into 1" outside the 5 ring. Next up is a test @ 50yd.
Today, I retested the Rapine and Tanner RB's using the same patching and powder charge for each, and confirmed what I suspected: My gun likes the Tanner RB much better than the Rapine, which doesn't group very well at all. Although I didn't test it today, past experience with the Dixie has also been gratifiying. All testing has been @ 25yd. using FFg, both Graf's/Wano and Diamondback (today). Patches were red striped pillow ticking, which mic's ~.001" less than the blue striped version by the same manufacturer and is .013" compressed. This makes starting and seating the RB a pleasure. No blown patches with the .013" ticking either. Lube was Winchester Sutler's "Moose Milk" (soaked the patches in it and kept them fairly wet). However, "Friendship Speed Juice" (equal parts Murphy's Oil Soap, isopropyl alcohol, and 3% hydrogen peroxide) works just as well if not better. Btw, I don't wipe the bore at all when using either lube in the trade gun.
So what did I learn today? (1) That my gun does better with .597" - .600" RB's. (2) That patch thickness is more a question of ease of loading than accuracy. I.e., .013" - .016" compressed pillow tick patches work equally well, but much more effort is needed to load those as thick as .020". (3) That powder charge isn't so critical @ 25yd. as I thought. Today I used 70gr. Diamondback FFg and got the same results as I did with 85gr. of the same powder & Graf's. Moreover, the results with 70gr. Graf's FFFg were about the same, albeit with more recoil. (4) That it's better not to introduce too many variables (ball diameters, patch thicknesses) at a time when testing. (5) That I now need to sell the Rapine mold!
Just for laughs, and practice too since the NMLRA July postal match target is due by the 31st, I tried offhand shooting at a copy of that target (diameter of 8, 9 & 10 rings [black] is 2 3/4"). Once I settled down, I was able to keep 3 in the 8 & 9 rings, but my own wobbliness and flint issues combined to put the other 5 elsewhere. However, 3 of those others grouped into 1" outside the 5 ring. Next up is a test @ 50yd.